2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli in the Rat Whisker System: Behavior and Neurometrics

Abstract: Understanding the neural code underlying perception requires the mapping of physical stimulus parameters to both psychophysical decisions and neuronal responses. Here, we employed a novel psychophysical task in head-fixed rats to measure discriminability of vibrotactile whisker deflections. Rats could discriminate 90 Hz from 60 Hz pulsatile stimuli if stimulus intensity covaried with frequency. To pin down the physical parameters used by the rats to discriminate these vibrations, we manipulated stimulus amplit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
78
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(63 reference statements)
13
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with a recent study (31) that found interactions between movement frequency and amplitude in whisker sensation. Gerdjikov and colleagues measured the licking response of head-fixed rats to sequences of discrete pulses delivered at various frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our findings are consistent with a recent study (31) that found interactions between movement frequency and amplitude in whisker sensation. Gerdjikov and colleagues measured the licking response of head-fixed rats to sequences of discrete pulses delivered at various frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Indeed, the phase of firing within one cycle (or one half of a cycle, in the case of direction-nonselective cells) is determined by mechanical rectification that limits the range of possible neuronal phase preference for a wide range of stimulus frequencies. Another observation is the gradual change in response magnitude and phase that takes place during offset repetitive whisker deflections (Fraser et al, 2006;Gerdjikov et al, 2010). This observation has been extensively analyzed in the current study, playing a major role in the construction of the dynamic rectification model.…”
Section: Mechanoreceptor Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…On the other hand, many other studies used head restraining for accurate stimulation of whiskers by piezoelectric motors (Gerdjikov et al, 2010) or air puffs (Martin et al, 2002;Sachdev et al, 2000). For example, Gerdjikov et al (2010) fixed a whisker in a glass capillary which was moved sinusoidally by a piezoelectric bender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gerdjikov et al (2010) fixed a whisker in a glass capillary which was moved sinusoidally by a piezoelectric bender. Sachdev et al (2000) applied air puffs similarly in a head-restrained rat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%