2001
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminating time intervals presented in sequences marked by visual signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
2
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
69
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding confirmed the validity of the behavioral task and indicated that the subjects responded based on what they actually perceived, i.e., they consistently judged the sequence as anisochronous when they were aware of the change in deviant stimulus timing and as isochronous when they were unaware of such a change, even though the deviant stimuli were physically identical in their temporal and nontemporal properties. The subjects' performance was within the range of anisochrony detection threshold for visual stimuli reported in the literature (24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This finding confirmed the validity of the behavioral task and indicated that the subjects responded based on what they actually perceived, i.e., they consistently judged the sequence as anisochronous when they were aware of the change in deviant stimulus timing and as isochronous when they were unaware of such a change, even though the deviant stimuli were physically identical in their temporal and nontemporal properties. The subjects' performance was within the range of anisochrony detection threshold for visual stimuli reported in the literature (24).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…When examining the human timing literature, the reader should consider whether participants were asked to segment temporal information or to refrain from using any strategies such as foot tapping, imaging, repetitive movements, or counting seconds Grondin, Ouellet, & Roussel, 2004;. Indeed, there are several reports that show that at certain points between 1 and 2 sec, the Weber fraction 6 is not constant; that is, it is higher at 1.5 and 2 sec than at 1 sec (Drake & Botte, 1993;Grondin, 2001a;Lavoie & Grondin, 2004;Madison, 2001). The fact that the Weber fraction does not remain constant for a larger range of durations could be argued to reflect short-term memory limitations (Gilden & Marusich, 2009;Grondin, 2001c).…”
Section: Specific Investigation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple-interval advantages have been reported for both auditory and visual sequences for tasks involving time interval perception, as well as production (Grondin, 2001a;Ivry & Hazeltine, 1995;McAuley & Jones, 2003;McAuley & Kidd, 1998;Rousseau & Rousseau, 1996;ten Hoopen & Akerboom, 1983). There are notable exceptions, however.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are notable exceptions, however. Some studies have reported mixed results (Grondin, 2001a;Hirsh, Monahan, Grant, & Singh, 1990;Schulze, 1989), whereas others have shown no multiple-interval advantage (Pashler, 2001;ten Hoopen et al, 1994). One factor preventing a clear interpretation of some of this research is that the numbers of standard and comparison intervals have sometimes covaried, making the precise reason for improvements in tempo sensitivity unclear (Drake & Botte, 1993;Grondin, 2001a;McAuley & Kidd, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation