2016
DOI: 10.1163/15685411-00003022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminating between the eggs of two egg-mass-producing nematode genera using morphometric and molecular techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PCA analyses confirmed the genetic separation between M. enterolobii, M. javanica and M. incognita . This result was expected since the distinction of these species has been reported using different markers 24 , 37 . The analysis also revealed a close genetic proximity of the four M. enterolobii populations when the 277 SNPs dataset (present in all four populations) was used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PCA analyses confirmed the genetic separation between M. enterolobii, M. javanica and M. incognita . This result was expected since the distinction of these species has been reported using different markers 24 , 37 . The analysis also revealed a close genetic proximity of the four M. enterolobii populations when the 277 SNPs dataset (present in all four populations) was used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Although M. enterolobii can be separated from other Meloidogyne species by the use of various universal markers e.g. 28S, COI, 16S and IGS 24 , 37 , 38 , distinguishing between M. javanica and M. incognita has been unsuccessful in various studies due to the high genetic similarity among the latter species and M. arenaria 37 41 . In this study, however, several putatively discriminative SNPs to M. javanica, M. incognita and M. enterolobii were identified and will enable the accurate distinction between these species through the development of allele-specific PCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher PV, MPD and frequency of occurrence values recorded in the present study for R. parvus are another interesting phenomena which may be attributed to the constant expansion of soybean production into maize production areas. Recently, Bekker et al (2016) reported that R. parvus has been frequently encountered at a high population density in local maize production areas since 2011. This species has in the past been listed to commonly occur, but generally in low abundance, in local soils where cereal crops (Jordaan et al 1992), groundnuts (Venter et al 1992) and sunflower (Bolton et al 1989) were produced, with its impact on such crops being unknown (Bekker et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Bekker et al (2016) reported that R. parvus has been frequently encountered at a high population density in local maize production areas since 2011. This species has in the past been listed to commonly occur, but generally in low abundance, in local soils where cereal crops (Jordaan et al 1992), groundnuts (Venter et al 1992) and sunflower (Bolton et al 1989) were produced, with its impact on such crops being unknown (Bekker et al 2016). Scutellonema brachyurus followed as the second predominant semi-endoparasitic species in soil samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial yield losses in maize (up to 60%) (Riekert and Henshaw, 1998) and soybean (up to 100%) ( Smit and De Beer, 1998 ; Fourie et al, 2013 ) due to infection by this genus demonstrate its adverse impact on crop production. Moreover, Helicotylenchus , Rotylenchulus , and Scutellonema are also abundant in local crop fields, indicating their potential impact on crop production ( Fourie et al, 2001 ; Bekker et al, 2016 ; Mbatyoti et al, 2018 ). Therefore, grasslands may act as reservoirs for herbivores that pose a threat to crop production should such areas be converted into agricultural fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%