2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31963-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and phylogeny of South African Meloidogyne populations using genotyping by sequencing

Abstract: Meloidogyne species cause great crop losses worldwide. Although genetic host plant resistance is an effective control strategy to minimize damage caused by Meloidogyne, some resistant genes are ineffective against virulent species such as Meloidogyne enterolobii. Detailed knowledge about the genetic composition of Meloidogyne species is thus essential. This study focused on genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and Pool-Seq to elucidate the genetic relation between South African M. enterolobii, M. incognita and M. ja… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4B ). In this line, use of molecular markers, viz., ribosomal D2D3 expansion segment, ITS rDNA, IGS rDNA, mitochondrial COI, viable region between COII and 16S rDNA, mitochondrial NADH5 and SCAR marker has been found to be more robust for specific confirmation of the species ( Tigano et al, 2010 ; Onkendi and Moleleki, 2013 ; Rashidifard et al, 2018 ); and SCAR marker proved best in the situation of occurrence of mixed populations consisting of M. enterolobii, M. incognita, M. javanica , and M. hapla Chitwood, 1949 ( Rashidifard et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4B ). In this line, use of molecular markers, viz., ribosomal D2D3 expansion segment, ITS rDNA, IGS rDNA, mitochondrial COI, viable region between COII and 16S rDNA, mitochondrial NADH5 and SCAR marker has been found to be more robust for specific confirmation of the species ( Tigano et al, 2010 ; Onkendi and Moleleki, 2013 ; Rashidifard et al, 2018 ); and SCAR marker proved best in the situation of occurrence of mixed populations consisting of M. enterolobii, M. incognita, M. javanica , and M. hapla Chitwood, 1949 ( Rashidifard et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate distinction of M. enterolobii , M. javanica , and M. incognita was still challenging using various molecular techniques, except for SCAR-PCR ( Zijlstra et al, 2000 ) and genotyping by sequencing method for identifying diagnostic single nucleotide polymorphisms ( Rashidifard et al, 2018 ). In our study, SCAR markers were used successfully for distinguishing populations of M. javanica from M. incognita , so 37 populations produced specific band of M. javanica and four populations produced the band typical for M. incognita .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAPD markers revealed a low intraspecific genetic diversity (14%) among 17 isolates of this species parasitizing potato in Brazil (Medina et al, 2017). Principal component and phylogenetic analyses revealed distant relationship between M. javanica and M. enterolobii Yang and Eisenback, 1983 populations from South Africa (Rashidifard et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could be a beneficial low cost and high-throughput tool for M. enterolobii diagnosis ( Davis et al, 2005 ; Holterman et al, 2012 ). Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) technique discovers SNPs to whole-genome profiling of association panels ( Elshire et al, 2011 ) and has been used successfully to investigate the phylogenetic genetic relationships of M. enterolobii , M. incognita , and M. javanica populations in South Africa and identify 34 SNPs that were useful to discriminate between the three Meloidogyne species investigated ( Rashidifard et al, 2018 ). The complete genomes of the root-knot species M. incognita , M. hapla , and M. enterolobii have been sequenced and reported ( Abad et al, 2008 ; Opperman et al, 2008 ; Koutsovoulos et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Identification Methods and Population Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%