2017
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.11.046004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant collaborative neighborhood preserving embedding for hyperspectral imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate the performance of different algorithms, the experiment was repeated 20 times with randomly selected training sets, and finally the average classification accuracy of each method was obtained. DCNPE method in literature [Lv et al (2017)], LADA method in literature [Wang et al (2017)], DLPP method in literature [Deng et al (2015)], Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA for short), sparse preserving projection (SPP for short) and domain-preserving embedding (NPE for short) are selected and compared with MDASSP method. For better comparison, the parameters of each method are adjusted to the best.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to evaluate the performance of different algorithms, the experiment was repeated 20 times with randomly selected training sets, and finally the average classification accuracy of each method was obtained. DCNPE method in literature [Lv et al (2017)], LADA method in literature [Wang et al (2017)], DLPP method in literature [Deng et al (2015)], Kernel Principal Component Analysis (KPCA for short), sparse preserving projection (SPP for short) and domain-preserving embedding (NPE for short) are selected and compared with MDASSP method. For better comparison, the parameters of each method are adjusted to the best.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on existing research [Uddin et al (2019), Jayaprakash et al (2020), Wan et al (2017, Dongyang andLi (2018), Qiao et (2010), Kianisarkaleh and Ghassemian (2016), Zhai et al (2016), Gao et al (2016), Wang et al (2017), Lv et al (2017), Tabejamaat and Mousavi (2017), Dong et al (2021), Yc (2021), Yuan (2021)], this paper proposes a hyperspectral image classification method based on Manifold Data Analysis and Sparse Subspace Projection (MDASSP). Good results have been achieved in small samples.…”
Section: Introdutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manifold learning methods attempt to reveal the data that lie on or near a manifold in the original data space, which are expected to be highly useful for feature extraction of hyperspectral image. Locality preserving projection [15] and neighborhood preserving embedding (NPE) [16] are two classical linear manifold learning methods, and they provide good performance for classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal component analysis (PCA) [19] and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [20] are two typical subspace linear transformation approaches, but they cannot effectively reveal the nonlinear structure of the data. For this reason, researchers put forward some manifold learning methods, which can better mine potential low-dimensional manifold structures of high-dimensional data, such as local preserving projection (LPP) [21], locally linear embedding [22] and neighborhood preserving embedding [23]. The above methods can be classified into graph embedding framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%