2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discriminant analysis of longitudinal cortical thickness changes in Alzheimer's disease using dynamic and network features

Abstract: Neuroimage measures from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, such as cortical thickness, have been playing an increasingly important role in searching for bio-markers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent studies show that, AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and normal control (NC) can be distinguished with relatively high accuracy using the baseline cortical thickness. With the increasing availability of large longitudinal datasets, it also becomes possible to study the longitudinal changes of cortical thickness … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
127
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
9
127
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a sense, our classification results are not competitive with Li et al (2012), who attained over 95% accuracy; however, they used much more information in their classification. Not only did Li et al (2012) use five timepoints and over 200 features, but perhaps even more importantly, they used the raw thinning data directly in their discriminant analysis, which allowed their algorithm to use locational information about which specific region was thinning.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a sense, our classification results are not competitive with Li et al (2012), who attained over 95% accuracy; however, they used much more information in their classification. Not only did Li et al (2012) use five timepoints and over 200 features, but perhaps even more importantly, they used the raw thinning data directly in their discriminant analysis, which allowed their algorithm to use locational information about which specific region was thinning.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, to compare thicknesses among different subjects, this procedure required normalization by personal characteristics, such as age and gender (Barnes et al, 2010;Sowell et al, 2007), as this affects baseline thicknesses, complicating the process. For longitudinal data, personalized (by subject) networks have been constructed using temporal correlations between regions (Li et al, 2012), which we discuss below.…”
Section: Connectome Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to recent studies on the ADNI data that rely on combinations of complex features [7], [33], [53], [54], [55] or integrations of multiple modalities [5], [56], [14], the proposed biomarker is a single MRI-based interpretable feature. When the grading value is close to −1, it indicates that the subject is more characteristic of PMCI than SMCI and has a high possibility to convert to AD within 3 years while the grading value 1 means that this MCI subject will possibly remain stable within this period.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional cortical thinning has been extensively studied using cortical thickness analysis, and is a valuable imaging marker for AD, frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Lewy body disease, and other neurodegenerative diseases (7,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). Longitudinal evaluation of cortical thinning is a potential tool for treatment response evaluation and for monitoring clinical progression of AD (25,26). Nevertheless, cortical thickness analysis methods have not been incorporated into radiological practice, primarily because the researchoriented Freesurfer method is time consuming and may need manual editing despite its fully automatic nature (7,8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%