Discrete element modelling of the in-plane and out-of-plane behaviour of dry-joint masonry wall constructions

Abstract

International audienceThis paper aims to improve knowledge on the suitability of the discrete element method (DEM) to simulate the in-plane and out-of-plane behaviour of different in-configuration structural masonry walls constructed with dry joints. The study compares the results obtained from laboratory tests against those predicted using the three-dimensional distinct element 3DEC software. Significant features of the structural behaviour shown by the walls are discussed and conclusions on their ultimate capacity and failure mechanisms are addressed. A key feature of the DEM is the important role that brick discontinuities, i.e. joints, play in the mechanics of masonry. Within DEM, the bricks were modelled as continuum rigid elements while the joints were modelled by line interface elements represented by the Mohr-Coulomb law. The analysis of the results showed that the model developed is capable of representing the crack development and load carrying capacity of masonry structures constructed with dry joints with sufficient accuracy. Moreover, a collection of experimentally verified material parameters is provided to be used by other researchers and engineers and to develop a reliable model to solve engineering challenges worldwide. © 2017 Elsevier Lt

Feasibility Study of Low-Cost Image-Based Heritage Documentation In Nepal

“…Such structural model can then be coupled with structural engineering tools, such as advanced 3D finite and discrete element methods of analysis (Bui et al, 2017;Giamundo et al, 2014), to assess the robustness and vulnerability of historic structures to extreme natural disasters, e.g. earthquakes, flooding (Sarhosis et al, 2016).…”

Distinct element modelling of the in‐plane cyclic response of URM walls subjected to shear‐compression

“…Possible discrepancies in terms of bilinear envelopes were also considered by introducing the dimensionless parameter Δ bil , ie, the average standard error between the areas computed under positive/negative branches of both experimental and numerical curves. As suggested by Faella et al 82 the function errors defined by Equations (18) to (20) were considered, where n c represents the number of loading cycles:…”

“…The work of Papantonopoulos et al and Psycharis et al on the seismic behaviour of Greek monumental structures, as well as the contributions of Lemos and Azevedo et al who analysed the experimental cyclic behaviour of a stone façade and of stone columns respectively, demonstrated the capabilities of the DEM approach. DeJong and Vibert modelled the cyclic response of dry‐stone spires both experimentally and with DEM, while recently, Bui et al compared both in‐plane and OOP experimental behaviour of dry‐joint URM prototypes and modelling results. The seismic response of arched structures has also been scrutinised in some depth, ranging from numerical applications concerning rigid blocks subjected to impulsive base motions (eg, DeLorenzis et al) to full earthquake time‐history analysis to support the design of a stone masonry vault (eg, DeJong et al).…”

Seismic Vulnerability of Different in Geometry Historic Masonry Towers

“…In order to put at disposal to practitioners some formulas to preliminarily estimate the seismic vulnerability of an existing tower (without the need to perform any calculation), in the present paper we analyze a series of "idealized" benchmark cases using different simplified approaches, namely the procedure proposed by the Italian code and pushover conducted with two commercial codes (UDEC [20]- [26] and 3Muri [27]). The geometry is intentionally idealized into parallelepiped blocks with hollow square cross-section, thus favoring the utilization of 2D approaches, in order to drastically reduce the computational effort required in carrying out medium scale systematic computations.…”