Discrete choice and survival models in employee turnover analysis

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the capacity of two methodological approaches – discrete choice and survival analysis models – to investigate the relationship between socio-economic characteristics and turnover in a retailing company. A comparison of the estimation results under each model and their interpretation is carried out. The study provides a guide to determine, assess and interpret the effects of different driving factors behind turnover. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a data set containing information about 1,199 workers followed up between January 2007 and December 2009. First, not distinguishing voluntary and involuntary resignation, a binary logistic regression model and a Cox proportional hazards (PH) model for univariate survival data are set up and estimated. Second, distinguishing voluntary and involuntary resignation, a multinomial logistic regression model and a Cox PH model for competing risk data are set up and estimated. Findings When no distinction is made, the results point that wage and age exert a negative effect on turnover. Risk of resignation is higher for male, single, not married and Spanish nationals. When the distinction is made, previous results hold for voluntary turnover: wage, age, gender, marital status and nationality are significant. However, when explaining involuntary turnover, all variables except wage lose explaining power. The survival analysis approach is better suited as it measures risk of resignation in a longitudinal way. Discrete choice models only study the risk at a particular cut-off point (24 months in case of this study). Originality/value This paper is a systematic application, evaluation and comparison of four different statistical models for analysing employee turnover in a single firm. This work is original because no systematic comparison has been done in the context of turnover.

Interpersonal Fairness, Willingness-to-Stay and Organisation-Based Self-Esteem: The Mediating Role of Affective Commitment

“…Meanwhile, the adverse effects of employees leaving their organisations are enormous: huge financial costs, interference of co-workers’ relations, additional work stress, low quality of work and diminished abilities to adapt to uncertain environments (Prabhakar, 2016). Despite these adverse effects of turnover, it can also be beneficial when low-productivity workers are more likely to leave (i.e., functional turnover): Such an argument implies that optimal turnover rate is not zero (Madariaga et al, 2018). This led Lee (2018) to empirically conclude that elimination of poorly performing employees contributes to improve organisational performance.…”

HR analytics: An emerging field finding its place in the world alongside simmering ethical challenges

“…This is not to say that there are not good examples of HR related analytic projects published, indeed we pointed to some of these in our call. We mentioned as examples, Bidwell (2011) who looked at the retention and performance potential of internal versus external hires; Levenson et al (2006) who explored the relationship between managerial competencies and performance; and Madariaga et al (2017) who utilised discrete choice and survival analyses to explore the relationship between socio-economic characteristics and turnover. Furthermore, as indicated by Larsson and Edwards (2021), there are also a range of HR Analytics projects published in other fields (e.g.…”

Economic, organizational and psychological determinants of early turnover: evidence from a pharmaceutical company in China

“…First, the present study did not distinguish voluntary and involuntary turnover. Future research should take the voluntariness of turnover into consideration by using multinomial logistic regression and competing risk models that provide unbiased estimations for forced and voluntary decisions (Madariaga et al , 2018). Second, due to the limitation of using data retrieved from a database and reasons of separation were coded from the individuals' responses to interview questions by organizational HR team, we could only offer an approximate and general measure of dissatisfaction aspects, especially on complex constructs like job stress.…”