2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1709.09117
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention: a General Equivalence Result

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Mehta, Rajiv, and Srinivasan (2003), Honka and Chintagunta (2016), and Abaluck and Compiani (2019) consider search frameworks, where the DM follows a sequential protocol to learn about the payoffs generated by the available alternatives. Csaba (2018) adopts a rational inattention perspective, where the attentional costs sustained by the DM to process information structures are parametrically modelled, along the lines of Caplin and Dean (2015), Matȇjka and McKay (2015), Fosgerau, Melo, de Palma, andShum (2017), andLeahy (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mehta, Rajiv, and Srinivasan (2003), Honka and Chintagunta (2016), and Abaluck and Compiani (2019) consider search frameworks, where the DM follows a sequential protocol to learn about the payoffs generated by the available alternatives. Csaba (2018) adopts a rational inattention perspective, where the attentional costs sustained by the DM to process information structures are parametrically modelled, along the lines of Caplin and Dean (2015), Matȇjka and McKay (2015), Fosgerau, Melo, de Palma, andShum (2017), andLeahy (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We develop a choice model estimation framework with latent constructs that capture information heterogeneity within the data. The key difference between our work and previous literature is that we show how rational inattention can be framed as a flexible and extendable generative learning model that emulates the cognitive processes in human behaviour [13,14]. We postulate that realistic behavioural patterns can be modelled using a data-driven generative learning process and we estimate a model to represent the underlying heterogeneity of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We propose a generative model framework that extends rational inattentive behaviour in discrete choice, interpreting it as an optimization process rather than a structural model specification. We differentiate our work from the generalized entropy function described in [13] by framing non-normative behaviour as a learning model -allowing for random perturbations to be data-driven. Under this framework, the estimation of a generative model assumes to emulate information processing constraints in rational inattention behaviour and identifies observed and latent variable interactions through a neural network interface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations