2017
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2017.1332255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discrete and Continuous Finite Element Models and Their Calibration via Vibration and Material Tests for the Seismic Assessment of Masonry Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The learning process in this neural network is to optimize the functional generator f . Equation (15) shows that it is necessary to minimize the deviation ∆x t+1 between the estimated value and the monitored real data to bring the generated valuex t+1 close to the real one x t+1 .…”
Section: Mathematical Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The learning process in this neural network is to optimize the functional generator f . Equation (15) shows that it is necessary to minimize the deviation ∆x t+1 between the estimated value and the monitored real data to bring the generated valuex t+1 close to the real one x t+1 .…”
Section: Mathematical Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output model resulting from the ambient vibration experiment calibrated the FEA model and improved the correlation between the computational and experimental parameters. Erdogan calibrated the discrete and continuous FEA models thorough the combination of vibration and material tests for the purpose of the seismic assessment [ 15 ]. The procedure considers the stiffness of contact between adjacent stone units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of FE model updating to ancient masonry buildings is relatively recent. In [4,5,12,13,15,20,22,24,27,33,37,38,43] a vibration-based model updating is conducted, and preliminary FE models are tuned by using the dynamic characteristics determined through system identification techniques. In the papers cited above the modal analysis of the FE models are conducted via commercial codes, and the model updating procedure is implemented separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above procedure allows to identify reliable and robust FE models to be subsequently employed for different structural purposes. Many of the studies available in literature report on applications of AVT and OMA with multiple goals, such as damage assessment (Betti et al, 2015;Clementi et al, 2017;Alkayem et al, 2018), seismic vulnerability assessment (Bartoli et al, 2015;Erdogan, 2017), structural health assessment and monitoring (Castellazzi et al, 2012;Ramos et al, 2013;Pieraccini et al, 2017;Bassoli et al, 2018), modal updating and identification (Aoki et al, 2008;Chiorino et al, 2011;Torres et al, 2017;Girardi et al, 2019;Pavlovic et al, 2019), bell swinging effects assessment (Diaferio et al, 2017;Bru et al, 2019) and evaluation of the effectiveness of retrofitting (Pierdicca et al, 2019). While the vibration-based structural assessment is today a methodology particularly appreciated in the field of historic structures (because of its non-invasiveness and non-destructiveness) several issues still arise concerning the dynamic test setups to be adopted for each building typology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%