Protein kinase B (PKB ⁄ AKT) is an attractive therapeutic target in anticancer drug development. We have recently identified by docking-based virtual screening a low micromolar AKT-2 inhibitor. Additionally, the virtual screening hit represents a novel AKT-2 inhibitor scaffold. In this work, we discuss a structure-based design strategy toward the optimization of this hit. Following this strategy and using a herein validated docking protocol, we conducted the design of novel compounds with expected improved activity over the parent compound. The newly designed molecules have high predicted affinity for AKT-2; are synthetically accessible and are contained within the kinase-relevant property space.Key words: AKT, cancer, drug design, structure-activity relationships Abbreviations: HBA, hydrogen bond acceptors; HBD, hydrogen bond donors; IFD, induce-fit docking; MOE, molecular operating environment; MW, molecular weight; RB, number of rotatable bonds; SAR, structure-activity relationships; TPSA, topological surface area; XP, extra precision. The serine ⁄ threonine kinase B, also known as AKT, has several downstream targets that regulate a number of processes associated with cell growth, differentiation and division. AKT is frequently amplified and over-expressed in human cancer cells and its inhibition is a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of cancers (1,2). There are three known subtypes, AKT-1 ⁄ PKBa, AKT-2 ⁄ PKBb and AKT-3 ⁄ PKBc. Each one is associated with different types of cancers. In particular, AKT-2 is amplified in pancreatic, breast and ovarian tumors. AKT-3 is over expressed in hormoneinsensitive breast and prostate cancers (1). Aberrations in AKT-1 are less common. AKT has an N-terminal pleckstrin homology domain, a hinge region, a central kinase domain, and a C-terminal region (3). The kinase domains have a large similarity of more than 85% and the binding pocket residues are the same (3,4). To date, small molecules targeting the ATP-binding site in the kinase domain, and allosteric inhibitors interfering with the pleckstrin homology domain function have been reported, among others (3-6). AKT inhibitors, either ATP competitors or compounds that interact with regulatory domains, have shown promising activity in cancer treatment. It is thought that subtype-selective inhibitors are needed for optimal efficacy with acceptable toxicity (1). However, it remains to be determined if subtype selective inhibitors have a larger therapeutic window over compounds that inhibit all three subtypes (4). For example, a pan-AKT inhibitor with nanomolar activity against the three subtypes has been evaluated as an intravenous agent in clinical trials in patients with cancer (7). Small molecules targeting the ATP-binding site have been reported. These include isoquinoline-5-sulfonamides (8,9), pyrazole (see below), (10) indazole (11) and aminofurazan analogs (7). Several of these inhibitors haven been developed using structure-based design techniques and are reviewed in Ref. (4). Despite the fact that some c...