2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/2192853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovery and Validation of Hypermethylated Markers for Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide. Screening and early diagnosis are critical for the clinical management of this disease. DNA methylation changes have been regarded as promising biomarkers for CRC diagnosis. Here, we map DNA methylation profiling on CRC in six CRCs and paired normal samples using a 450 K bead array. Further analysis confirms the methylation status of candidates in two data sets from the Gene Expression Omnibus. Receiver operating characteristic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also applied a regularized Cox regression method, which was developed mainly based on LASSO regression, to select 26 important DNA methylation probes with non-zero coefficients from the identified 340 DNA methylation sites (see Materials and Methods; Table S6). Among these 26 significant probes, the change in DNA methylation of some members was reported to be potential indicators of some cancer types, such as PLEKHA6 [18], MARVELD1 [14], MST1R [19], LTBP1 [20], CLIC3 [21], SLC13A5 [22], SFRP5 [23], CPXM1 [24], and AKR1B1 [25]. After that, we introduced a risk score, which was defined as a linear combination of the β -values and the corresponding coefficients of these 26 DNA methylation probes derived from regularized Cox regression (see Materials and Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also applied a regularized Cox regression method, which was developed mainly based on LASSO regression, to select 26 important DNA methylation probes with non-zero coefficients from the identified 340 DNA methylation sites (see Materials and Methods; Table S6). Among these 26 significant probes, the change in DNA methylation of some members was reported to be potential indicators of some cancer types, such as PLEKHA6 [18], MARVELD1 [14], MST1R [19], LTBP1 [20], CLIC3 [21], SLC13A5 [22], SFRP5 [23], CPXM1 [24], and AKR1B1 [25]. After that, we introduced a risk score, which was defined as a linear combination of the β -values and the corresponding coefficients of these 26 DNA methylation probes derived from regularized Cox regression (see Materials and Methods).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, most of the members with shortened 3′UTR in the panel were tumor‐associated genes. ADD2 has conserved 3′UTR isoforms, and the DNA methylation status of ADD2 is a screening marker of colorectal cancer . IL21R is highly expressed in TNBC and enhances the invasion and migration of IL21R+ breast cancer cells in a dose‐dependent manner .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let β = (β 0 , β 1 , β 2 , β 3 ), γ = (σ 2 , τ, υ, Σ) and µ be the vector of the fixed effects, the vector of variance components and the LGF, respectively. Integrating out the random-effects AMP i , CpG j and CpG * j , (2)-(5) can be rewritten in a more compact formulation that encompasses all models considered y ij |β, γ, µ ∼ π(y ij |β, γ, µ), (6)…”
Section: Methylcalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism implies the addition of a methyl group to the 5'-carbon of cytosine in a CpG dinucleotide to form 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) (5). Modifications in DNA methylation could affect gene expression as reported in several types of diseases (6)(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%