2012
DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2012.702858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering development from information technologies: does open access to technology improve the lives of people?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some issues do remain much the same: communication and development as it relates to poverty worldwide; access to a specific communication mode (from the mass media in the 1960s to internet and mobile technology-related media in the early 2000s); media interventions (whether for political development in the 1960s or health campaigns in the 1990s and beyond); and the ICT and development policy-making challenges for governments and, more recently, international organization, private sector organizations, and nongovernmental organizations/civil society. Yet just giving access to the internet and/or information technology-related components does not of itself improve lives (Qureshi 2012) or lead to development. For 2015 and beyond we need a newer framework as argued here -one that recognizes as Rangaswamy and Nair (2010, p.163) write: 'the poor as agile agents and innovative producers of ICT products and services'.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some issues do remain much the same: communication and development as it relates to poverty worldwide; access to a specific communication mode (from the mass media in the 1960s to internet and mobile technology-related media in the early 2000s); media interventions (whether for political development in the 1960s or health campaigns in the 1990s and beyond); and the ICT and development policy-making challenges for governments and, more recently, international organization, private sector organizations, and nongovernmental organizations/civil society. Yet just giving access to the internet and/or information technology-related components does not of itself improve lives (Qureshi 2012) or lead to development. For 2015 and beyond we need a newer framework as argued here -one that recognizes as Rangaswamy and Nair (2010, p.163) write: 'the poor as agile agents and innovative producers of ICT products and services'.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Genuine inclusion requires a holistic approach to technology that accounts for its role in potentially making every step of global forums more accessible, starting with registration and preparation materials and continuing with participation to the events and follow-up processes. Moreover, similar to the fact that “giving people open and free access to the internet may not necessarily lead to improvements in their lives” (Qureshi, 2012, p. 181), web conferencing and other tools can support meaningful participation only when they are embedded effectively within the surrounding context. As others in the field of IT for development have noted, this alerts us to “the interplay between ICT multi-level usage by various players within systems of governance, citizenship, communication, knowledge, and innovation” (Diga and May, 2016, p. 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICT enables global access to skill, expertise, and knowledge (Qureshi, 2012). Therefore, software companies can build a large and diverse pool of potential remote developers.…”
Section: Scattered Gsdmentioning
confidence: 99%