Discourses of Political Policing in Post-patten Northern Ireland

Abstract

This article critically examines discourses of political policing in contemporary Northern Ireland (NI). Recognising the post-conflict and post-reform climate that policing now occurs within, it argues that these environmental factors have conditioned discourses of policing that are directly tied to how legitimate political opposition to the political status quo in post-Good Friday Agreement (GFA) NI is policed. The article asserts that political policing discourses have taken a new trajectory that departs from traditional ethno-nationalist interpretations of the issue to instead reflect a broader structuralist interpretation of state-police power relations. It concludes with the argument that political policing discourses have evolved to reflect common class-based disillusionment with the post-GFA state across the political divide that sees the matter rooted in police protection of a system of devolved governance that has failed to tackle structural exclusion and socio-economic deprivation.

Policing in a United Ireland: The Intractable Questions of Governance, Oversight and Accountability

“…And in Northern Ireland, while serious advances have been seen in terms of human rights compliance, allegations of political policing have begun to dog the institution. 54 Ongoing legacy issues and the impact of Brexit also pose serious threats to sustained police change. 55 A SHARED ISLAND Into this space of scandal, reform and critique, and such a merged history of policing, comes the question of a shared island.…”

Can social media help end the harm? Public information campaigns, online platforms, and paramilitary-style attacks in a deeply divided society

“…Such attitudes are a manifestation of the political contention about policing that persists 20 years after the Agreement. During the conflict, many nationalist and republican communities distrusted the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC), the predominantly Protestant police force which was perceived as an extension of the unionist-controlled Stormont government during the conflict (Hearty, 2017). “Paramilitary vigilantism” was thus embedded within the social structures of many Catholic working-class neighborhoods in Belfast; it addressed the “policing needs” of these communities while also allowing paramilitaries to consolidate their control of these districts (Brewer et al, 1998).…”

Advancing Representation Theory to Reflect the Police Reform Process in Post-Troubles West Belfast

“…This article's approach and methodology build upon the work of Kevin Hearty, who utilizes qualitative discourse analysis to characterize contemporary narratives regarding policing in NI. Hearty's scope is broader than that of this article, as he typically explores republican and/or unionist discourse generally, while this article focuses on discourse within a militant, geographically confined community (Hearty, 2014(Hearty, , 2017(Hearty, , 2018a(Hearty, , 2018b. Hearty also examines a wider range of material, including archives, media coverage, and institutional publications in order to draw conclusions about discourse across larger population categories (Hearty, 2014(Hearty, , p. 1048).…”