The Syntax and Semantics of Pseudo-Incorporation 2015
DOI: 10.1163/9789004291089_007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse Properties of Bare Noun Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3). Modarresi (2015) points out that covert pronouns are special insofar as they, being covert, cannot express number. Hence they are suited to pick up number-neutral PINs as antecedents.…”
Section: Discourse Translucency: Farkas and De Swart (2003)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3). Modarresi (2015) points out that covert pronouns are special insofar as they, being covert, cannot express number. Hence they are suited to pick up number-neutral PINs as antecedents.…”
Section: Discourse Translucency: Farkas and De Swart (2003)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furhtermore, anaphoric reference is achieved via the established abstraction and summation rule. Following Modarresi (2015), this explains why number-neutral covert pronominals are particularly suited for anaphoric reference to PINs, and why, depending on world knowledge, overt singular and plural pronouns can be used as well, as in (8a), or (8b).…”
Section: Pins As Nominals Under Existential Closurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they are compatible with bare NPs as their antecedents in the subsequent discourse. This reasoning is in tandem with Modarresi's (2015) Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) account of bare nominals in Persian in which she argues that overt pronouns cannot pick up pseudo incorporated nominal as antecedents.…”
Section: The Pseudo-incorporation Analysismentioning
confidence: 74%