2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse of the Collective Subject as a Method for Analysis of Data in Ethnobiological Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitative data analysis consisted of interpreting key testimonials about the underlying meanings and central rationale behind the use of medicinal plants by rurban patients in particular (Lemos et al 2019). The testimonies were transcribed in Spanish, written in italics and between quotation marks, along with the patients' initials and ages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative data analysis consisted of interpreting key testimonials about the underlying meanings and central rationale behind the use of medicinal plants by rurban patients in particular (Lemos et al 2019). The testimonies were transcribed in Spanish, written in italics and between quotation marks, along with the patients' initials and ages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we formed the DCS from the combining the KE of different participants' discourse that indicates a certain CI or AC. The formula below illustrates the DCS formation process [21]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we formed the DCS from the combining the KE of different participants’ discourse that indicates a certain CI or AC. The formula below illustrates the DCS formation process [ 21 ]: Schematic representation A: DCS 1 = [KE (n2) + KE (n5) + KE (n8) + KE (nx)] CI Schematic representation B: DCS 2 = [KE (n3) + KE (n7) + KE (n9) + KE (nx)] AC where DCS = Discourse of the Collective Speech; KE = Key expression; CI = Central Idea; AC = Anchorage; n = study participants who presented the same CI or AC in their speech.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Con la información de las entrevistas previamente transcritas y los datos provenientes de las fuentes secundarias, hice un análisis de contenido y discurso (Campos et al, 2019;Lemos et al, 2019). A partir de ahí siguiendo a Sousa et al (2019), establecí subcategorías sobre las distintas formas de relación entre los Chachi y los primates que después las agrupé en tres categorías grandes o dimensiones etnoecológicas: kosmos (cosmovisión), corpus (conocimientos) y praxis (prácticas) (Toledo y Alarcón-Cháires, 2012).…”
Section: Análisis De La Informaciónunclassified