Discourse Markers

Ranger, Graham

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70905-5

Cited by 41 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, there are theories developed from the breakdown of other theories. For example, Theory of Enunciative and Predicative Operations by Culioli's (1983( -1984( in Ranger, 2018) is related to Integrated Pragmatic Theory. Studies which were conducted based on various approaches definitely had instilled certain understanding related to discourse markers features.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pragmatic approach also emphasises on how to align certain interpretations of discourse markers. This field also provide procedures of markers which contribute to underlying interpretations (Ranger, 2018). In this case, pragmatics give a guideline so meanings of words are understood based on a number of interpretation forms: Implicit, Presupposition dan Speech-Act.…”

Section: Various Discourse Markers/discourse Particles Based On Functions Of Pragmaticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Distribution of Discourse Markers Elements or Discourse Particle as an Entity Relationship in Discourse

et.al¹

2021

TURCOMAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The process of determining groups, features and functions of discourse markers or discourse particle are debateable among language researchers. Various definitions and classification of elements have developed confusion of its status. The efforts to rearrange various opinions related to discourse markers or discourse particles according to certain functions are able to create systematic categories and expose its functions clearly. This article aimed to examine a number of discourse markers concepts or discourse particles and its functions according to the context of grammar and pragmatics as well as the features and domains of discourse markers or discourse particles from views from past studies. The methodology used was the examination of discourse markers or discourse particles into a theory, a model which explained the functions of discourse markers or discourse particles. This explained the research findings which listed the inventory concept of discourse markers or discourse particles, the functions, features and domain of discourse markers or discourse particles in detailed. Distribution of concepts, functions and domain of discourse markers or discourse particles from the views from past studies indicated that discourse markers or discourse particles is a meaningful entity in communication.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Various Discourse Markers/discourse Particles Based On Functions Of Pragmaticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distribution of Discourse Markers Elements or Discourse Particle as an Entity Relationship in Discourse

et.al¹

2021

TURCOMAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Culture is a collection of learned and transmitted methods of thinking, feeling, and acting that represent the unique accomplishments of human groups, including their expression in artifacts (Ranger et al, 2018). According to Mironenko and Pavel (2018), it is an organisation of information, beliefs, procedures, attitudes, and artifacts that is shared among members of a community and is founded on traditional concepts and principles.…”

Section: Cultural Valuementioning

confidence: 99%

The water tap design for ablution activities considering cultural influences: a design for sustainability

Ghazali,

Padzil,

Mohamad

et al. 2023

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Water is a vital resource that should be utilized effectively. However, it is overused and squandered on a daily need, including the unrestrained use of water for ablution purposes. This condition can be due to a lack of awareness and the influences of peer cultural values. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop a water-tap design that takes into consideration the influences of cultural value. Accordingly, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling (SEM) approach the significant correlation between cultural influences and user preferences on water-tap design by referring at the critical threshold output of each attribute. The result showed that collectivism and uncertainty avoidance dimensions were identified as the influencing cultural dimensions and the automatic water level-control float valve, mechanical water-taps with auto-stop function, and transparent water tanks are the most important considerations for water tap technical specification. Through the assessment of its applicability, the use of the prototype can reduce water usage by 54.6% compared to regular water-taps. Correspondingly, the approach of cultural value in the designing process is expected to give more insights to practices such as product designers when determining design specification while for knowledge, it extends the applicability of Hofstede cultural theory for product design and development.

show abstract

“…esim. Culioli 1990: 21-22, 72-74, Culioli 1999: 102-103, Bearth 2001, Ranger 2018 4 Lähden tarkastelemaan -kin-liitettä olettaen, että sillä merkitään jotakin kielellistä operaatiota, jolla konstruoidaan lausumia, niiden merkityksiä ja suhdetta muihin lausumiin (ks. esim.…”

Section: Johdantounclassified

‑kin-liitteen semantiikasta ja diskursiivisista tehtävistä

Duvallon

2021

ESUKA-JEFUL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstrakti. Artikkelissa tarkastellaan ‑kin-liitteen sisältäviä nominaalisia ilmauksia, yhtäältä pronomineja, joissa ‑kin on sananmuodon kiinteä osa, ja toisaalta NP=kin-rakennetta, joissa ‑kin on itsenäiseen nominiin liitetty fokuspartikkeli. Lähtökohtana on oletus, että pro-sanoilla jokin, kukin, mikin on referentiaalisesti jotakin yhteistä NP=kin-rakenteen kanssa. ‑kin-liitteisiä pronomineja kuvataan selauksen käsitteen (rans. parcours, eng. scanning) avulla. Selaus tarkoittaa kielellistä operaatiota, jossa jonkin luokan jäseniä käydään läpi pysähtymättä yhdenkään niistä kohdalle. Yksinkertaisten pronominien (jokin, kukin) lisäksi huomio kohdistuu kahdesta pro-sanasta muodostuvaan distributiiviseen rakenteeseen milloin mikin ja sen diskursiivisiin käyttöihin. Artikkelissa esitetään, että selauksen käsite valottaa myös NP=kin-rakenteen merkitystä. ‑kin-partikkeli konstruoi NP:n tulkinnan taustalle luokan, jonka puitteissa sen tarkoite rinnastuu toisiin samankaltaisessa asemassa oleviin tarkoitteisiin. Tässä tapauksessa selausoperaatio ei koske NP:n referenssin rakentumista, vaan se vaikuttaa NP:n tarkoitteen statukseen osallistujana lausuman ilmaisemaan predikaatioon. ‑kin merkitsee, että tarkoitteeen ja predikaation suhde ei ole ainutkertainen. Selausoperaatiosta seuraa erilaisia tulkintoja sen mukaan, miten ‑kin-partikkelin konstruoima luokka muodostuu, ja aktivoiko partikkeli lausuman tulkinnassa yhden vai useamman fokuksen. Abstract. Outi Duvallon: On the semantics and discourse functions of the Finnish clitic ‑kin. This paper presents a study on two kinds of nominal expressions containing the morpheme ‑kin, the pronouns composed of a stem (jo‑, ku‑, mi‑) and the suffix ‑kin, and the NP=kin construction in which ‑kin is a clitic focus particle attached to an independent noun. The starting point is the assumption that the pronouns with the suffix ‑kin have something in common with the NP=kin construction with respect to their referential properties. The analysis is based on the concept of scanning (Fr. parcours), defined as designating an operation that consists in going through items of a class without stopping at anyone. In addition to the simple pronouns jokin ‘something’, kukin ‘each one’, attention is paid to the two-part expressions with distributive meaning, such as milloin mikin ‘at different times, different things’. The paper aims to show that the concept of scanning makes it also possible to shed light on the meaning and discourse functions of the NP=kin construction. Kokkuvõte. Outi Duvallon: Liite ‑kin semantikast ja diskursiivsetest funktsioonidest. Artiklis vaadeldakse kaht tüüpi kin-liidet sisaldavaid nominaalseid väljendeid: asesõnu, kus ‑kin on sõnavormi osa, ning NP=kin konstruktsioone, kus ‑kin on iseseisva nimisõnaga liidetud fookuspartikkel. Lähtutakse eeldusest, et asesõnad jokin, kukin, mikin on referentsiaalselt mingis osas NP=kin konstruktsiooniga sarnased. Kin-liitelisi asesõnu analüüsitakse skaneerimise mõiste abil (pr. parcours, ingl. scanning). Skaneerimine tähistab tegevust, mille käigus vaadeldakse järjestikku mingi klassi liikmeid, ühelgi eraldi peatumata. Lisaks lihtasesõnadele (jokin, kukin) pööratakse tähelepanu kahest asesõnast koosnevale distributiivse tähendusega väljendile milloin mikin ja selle kasutusele diskursuses. Artiklis näidatakse, et skaneerimise mõiste võimaldab heita valgust ka NP=kin konstruktsiooni tähendusele ja diskursiivsetele funktsioonidele.

show abstract

Discourse Markers

Cited by 41 publications

References 0 publications

Distribution of Discourse Markers Elements or Discourse Particle as an Entity Relationship in Discourse

Distribution of Discourse Markers Elements or Discourse Particle as an Entity Relationship in Discourse

The water tap design for ablution activities considering cultural influences: a design for sustainability

‑kin-liitteen semantiikasta ja diskursiivisista tehtävistä

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About