Discourse Analysis in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice (II)

Ponton, Douglas Mark; Larina, Tatiana V.

doi:10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1-7-21

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This analysis was used as it facilitates far greater understanding of meaning and helps to comprehend complex phenomena, as described by Fairclough (1992). In this way, the ideas expressed by farmers and veterinarians were more comprehensively scrutinised, thereby providing a greater elucidation of biosecurity practices (Ponton and Larina, 2017;Ponton and Larina, 2016;Hodges et al, 2008;Van Dijk, 1998).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence on the implementation of biosecurity measures in dairy cattle farms: Communication between veterinarians and dairy farmers

Moya

Chan

Hinchliffe

et al. 2021

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence on the implementation of biosecurity measures in dairy cattle farms: Communication between veterinarians and dairy farmers

Moya

Chan

Hinchliffe

et al. 2021

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The question of manipulation involves hot theoretical issues on meaning assignment [13,31]. Indeed, Sorlin [35] discusses the pragmatic nature of manipulation through a specific focus on the exploitation of im/politeness theories, paying special attention to its socio-psychological aspects that tend, in this author's view, to be overlooked in Critical Discourse Analysis and pragma-cognitive angles on the phenomenon.…”

Section: Pragmatic Factors At Stake In Manipulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Persuasion Versus Manipulation: The Input of Pragmatics and C.D.A.

Triki¹

2021

ALLC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Considering the pervasiveness of manipulation, and the widespread fallacy about its presumed unidirectional agency attributed to the manipulator acting on a passive manipulated person, the paper offers a theoretical discussion that advocates the necessity of fine-tuning various shades of persuasion vs manipulation placed on a cline. To this effect, the paper proffers a critical review of the various typologies on manipulation. Based on this theoretical discussion, and in addition to the time-honored rhetorical vantage point, the paper spells out some pragmatic factors to take into account when tackling manipulation, the ethical dimension of manipulation from a C.D.A. perspective, qualifying it as illegitimate control, the inherent vagueness of the term, its connection with deception from a Forensic Linguistic perspective, and a shift in focus towards the effects of manipulation from a Media Effects perspective. Thus, the deconstruction of manipulation is inevitably interdisciplinary as it is at the cross-roads of all these perspectives. In view of the complexity of the issue and its various manifestations, its analysis can only be thick.

show abstract

“…This "emotional turn" inevitably caused some changes in the subject matter of discourse analysis -it went far beyond current knowledge of how a human being constructs their social identity in different types of interaction (e.g. Langlotz & Locher 2017, Larina et al 2017.…”

Section: Modern Challenges For Discourse Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Этот «эмоциональный поворот» неизбежно вызвал некоторые изменения предметной области дискурс-анализа -убеждение перестало быть определяющим фактором для определения объекта исследования теории дискурса, дискурс способствует пониманию того, как человек конструирует свою социальную идентичность в различных типах взаимодействия (e.g. Langlotz & Locher 2017, Larina et al 2017.…”

Section: современные вызовы теории дискурсаunclassified

Language, culture and ideology in discursive practices

Bilá

Иванова

2020

Russian Journal of Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Discursive practices are looked upon as the core notion of discourse theory and the main instrument linguists can operate with studying language in connection with society and a human being. In this introductory article we will look into how language, culture and ideology are intertwined in diverse discursive practices and how these practices are shaped by people representing various cultures, ideologies and social entities. As part of linguistic discourse theory, we will briefly outline the major objectives and tenets of discourse theory or discourse analysis and track down the reasons why discourse theory turned into a dominant linguistic paradigm in the new millennium. Besides, some light will be thrown on the advancements and debatable questions arising within discourse theory as reflected in its methodology. Then we will give a brief synopsis of each individual paper and highlight theoretical and methodological contributions and innovations proposed by our authors. The results of the discussion as well as a brief outlook on future research will be summed up at the end of the introductory article.

show abstract

Discourse Analysis in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice (II)

Cited by 10 publications

References 4 publications

Influence on the implementation of biosecurity measures in dairy cattle farms: Communication between veterinarians and dairy farmers

Influence on the implementation of biosecurity measures in dairy cattle farms: Communication between veterinarians and dairy farmers

Persuasion Versus Manipulation: The Input of Pragmatics and C.D.A.

Language, culture and ideology in discursive practices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About