2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discounted penalty function at Parisian ruin for Lévy insurance risk process

Abstract: In the setting of a Lévy insurance risk process, we present some results regarding the Parisian ruin problem which concerns the occurrence of an excursion below zero of duration bigger than a given threshold r. First, we give the joint Laplace transform of ruin-time and ruin-position (possibly killed at the first-passage time above a fixed level b), which generalises known results concerning Parisian ruin. This identity can be used to compute the expected discounted penalty function via Laplace inversion. Seco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following result presents the joint Laplace transform involving the draw-down Parisian ruin time, the position of X at the draw-down Parisian ruin time, and its running supremum until the draw-down Parisian ruin time. It generalizes Theorem 3.1 in [22]. × e λξ (w)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following result presents the joint Laplace transform involving the draw-down Parisian ruin time, the position of X at the draw-down Parisian ruin time, and its running supremum until the draw-down Parisian ruin time. It generalizes Theorem 3.1 in [22]. × e λξ (w)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…More recently, in [22] a novel approach is adopted by connecting the desired Parisian ruin fluctuation quantity with the solution to the Kolmogorov forward equation for a spectrally negative Lévy process to find the joint Laplace transform of the Parisian ruin time and the Parisian ruin position, as well as an expression for the q-potential measure of the process killed at the Parisian ruin time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof is established for the case where X has paths of bounded and unbounded variation. To deal with unbounded variation case, we will use a limiting argument similar to the one employed in [17], [16] and adjust the ruin time (1.7) accordingly. For this reason, we introduce for ǫ ≥ 0 the stopping time τ ǫ r defined by τ ǫ r = inf{t > r : t − g ǫ t ≥ r} with g ǫ t := sup{s < t : Y s ≤ a − ǫ}.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this complication, we employ the following standard trick (see, e.g. Loeffen et al 2013or Baurdoux et al 2016).…”
Section: Inter-claim Brownian Motionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of Parisian ruin with deterministic clocks was first studied in Dassios & Wu (2008) for a Cramér-Lundberg process with exponential claim sizes. The results were later generalized to the case of spectrally negative Lévy processes in Czarna & Palmowski (2011) and Loeffen et al (2013) for the case of deterministic clocks, and in Landriault et al (2014) and Baurdoux et al (2016) for the case of random clocks, Erlang and exponential, respectively. In Czarna et al (2017), the distribution of the number of claims leading to Parisian ruin is computed for the Cramér-Lundberg process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%