1999
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.146434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disclosure Quality, Institutional Investors, and Stock Return Volatility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher risk with strong disclosure and governance Lang and Lundholm (1993) and Bushee and Noe (2000) find that greater return volatility is associated with higher quality disclosure, due to attempts by managers to reduce information asymmetry and due to institutional investors 1 Akhigbe and Whyte (2004) and Mamun et al (2005), however, empirically find that market risk was reduced following the passage of GLBA. Mamun et al (2005) argue that the reduction in market risk occurred because the GLBA legislation was successful in containing the incremental risk and created diversification opportunities.…”
Section: Relationships Between Risk Shifts and Disclosure And Governamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Higher risk with strong disclosure and governance Lang and Lundholm (1993) and Bushee and Noe (2000) find that greater return volatility is associated with higher quality disclosure, due to attempts by managers to reduce information asymmetry and due to institutional investors 1 Akhigbe and Whyte (2004) and Mamun et al (2005), however, empirically find that market risk was reduced following the passage of GLBA. Mamun et al (2005) argue that the reduction in market risk occurred because the GLBA legislation was successful in containing the incremental risk and created diversification opportunities.…”
Section: Relationships Between Risk Shifts and Disclosure And Governamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For instance, Tasker (1998) and Bushee and Noe (2000) found that firms with greater analyst following and greater institutional ownership were less likely to have conference calls that provide open access to all investors. Core (2001) reported evidence consistent with the intuition that informed investors preferred less disclosure, and that analysts and institutions produced information that reduced information asymmetry and the need for conference calls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along this same line of research, Bushee and Noe (1999) concluded that investors tend to be attracted to companies with greater levels of disclosure.…”
Section: Level Of Disclosure For Business Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 93%