Disciplinary Violation as Gender Violation: The Stigmatized Masculine Voice of Performance Studies

Gingrich-Philbrook, Craig

doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00218.x

Cited by 16 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is the gesture of reactionary responses to marriage equality, for example, that it will ruin traditional marriage and corrupt the children. It also parallels the concern voiced over the appearance of ''Sextext'' (Corey & Nakayama, 1997) nearly a decade before-a concern speaking in a decidedly homophobic register (Gingrich-Philbrook, 1998b). If only the evocative could contain its success so that the young wouldn't succumb to its unnatural pull.…”

Section: Striking a Match To ''Analysis'' Vs ''Evocation''mentioning

confidence: 63%

Autoethnography in an Almond Grove

Gingrich-Philbrook¹

2016

International Review of Qualitative Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The author offers a deconstructive reading of the distinction between “analytic” and “evocative” autoethnography, situating it as a shibboleth that, while useful to many, is often performed in ways that resemble the homophobic “concern” about the consequences of equality. He situates this deconstruction within a larger tale about the almond grove at the edge of his grandparents’ property and a reflection on the confirmation his grandmother gave him.

show abstract

Section: Striking a Match To ''Analysis'' Vs ''Evocation''mentioning

confidence: 63%

Autoethnography in an Almond Grove

Gingrich-Philbrook¹

2016

International Review of Qualitative Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pascall and Lewis (2004) identified voice as a key element of gender regimes. Thus, in this article, I present an alternative viewpoint to the "stigmatized masculine voice" (Gingrich-Philbrook, 1998) whilst unpicking a form of masculinity narrated as typical to a local area. To date, the issue of the masculine voice in entrepreneurship studies has been examined through a critical feminist lens (Simpson and Lewis, 2005).…”

Section: Introducing the Notion Of Gendered Entrepreneurial Regimesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Documenting Essex‐Boy as a local gendered regime

Smith

2013

International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…An understanding of 'voice' and its gendered nature (Gingrich-Philbrook, 1998;Simpson and Lewis, 2005) is crucial to understanding these voices because they are invariably skewed towards the masculine and the patriarchal. Other voices including employees are often silenced.…”

Section: Pascall and Lewis (2004) Identified Voice As A Key Element Imentioning

confidence: 99%

The “Fairness Paradox” and “Small-Firm Growth Resistance Strategies”

Ullah

Smith

2015

World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine and explore why “Small-Businesses” resist employing outside the immediate family and investigate the employee as an outsider and entrepreneurial resource. Design/methodology/approach – The authors review the literature on barriers to small-business growth concentrating on key empirical and theoretical studies. The authors use empirical data from the Federation of Small Business in which informants commented on growth and employing outside the family. Findings – The findings suggest that small business owners adopt a polemical stance, arguing that a barrage of employment regulations deters them from employing outsiders because doing so brings trouble in terms of costs such as insurance, taxes, paperwork, leave (maternity and paternity) entitlement, etc. They argue that employing from inside the family or ones peer group is much cheaper, convenient and less hassle. This ignores the entrepreneurial employee as a potential ingredient of growth and points to a paradox whereby the very values and emotions characterized by fairness of which of “smallness” and “familialness” is composed compound the issues of discrimination central to the debate. Research limitations/implications – The paper offer important insights for growth issues among small businesses and challenge the contemporary equilibrium in terms of small “family-orientated” business philosophy relating to employment practices. Ideologically, the entrepreneur is an “outsider” fighting the establishment, yet paradoxically, in a small-business context s/he becomes the establishment by employing outsiders. This results in the fairness vs unfairness paradox. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the existing knowledge and understanding on growth issues among small businesses by illuminating a paradoxical insider vs outsider tension.

show abstract

Disciplinary Violation as Gender Violation: The Stigmatized Masculine Voice of Performance Studies

Cited by 16 publications

References 27 publications

Autoethnography in an Almond Grove

Autoethnography in an Almond Grove

Documenting Essex‐Boy as a local gendered regime

The “Fairness Paradox” and “Small-Firm Growth Resistance Strategies”

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About