2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstper.8.010112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disciplinary authenticity: Enriching the reforms of introductory physics courses for life-science students

Abstract: Educators and policy makers have advocated for reform of undergraduate biology education, calling for greater integration of mathematics and physics in the biology curriculum. While these calls reflect the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of biology research, crossing disciplinary boundaries in the classroom carries epistemological challenges for both instructors and students. In this paper we expand on the construct of authenticity to better describe and understand disciplinary practices, in particular, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Curricular design was broadly governed by the principles of authenticity [26] and expansive framing [27,28]. Authenticity refers here to the curricular goal that students would perceive the curricular contexts to be meaningful ones, rather than attempts to find biological meaning where none actually existed (we do not, for example, consider the replacement of a car with an animal in a standard kinematics problem to be authentic).…”
Section: Curricular Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curricular design was broadly governed by the principles of authenticity [26] and expansive framing [27,28]. Authenticity refers here to the curricular goal that students would perceive the curricular contexts to be meaningful ones, rather than attempts to find biological meaning where none actually existed (we do not, for example, consider the replacement of a car with an animal in a standard kinematics problem to be authentic).…”
Section: Curricular Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eräs toinen tiedeopetukselle yleisesti asetettu tavoite on, että sen tulisi olla autenttista. Tiedeopetuksen autenttisuudella tarkoitetaan tyypillisesti sitä, että tiedeopetuksen tulee heijastella tieteelle luonteenomaisia piirteitä (sisältöjen ja työta-pojen osalta) tai, että oppilaille muodostuu totuudenmukainen kuva fysiikasta tieteenä (Chinn & Malhotra, 2002;Gilbert, 2004;Koponen & Nousiainen, 2015;Watkins, Coffey, Redish, & Cooke, 2012).…”
Section: Johdantounclassified
“…Nämä piirteet voivat olla tieteen käsitteitä, menetelmiä, prosesseja, epistemologiaa ja ajattelutapoja (Crawford, 2012, Watkins, Coffey, Redish, & Cooke, 2012. Esimerkiksi Chinn ja Malthora (2002) tarkastelivat episteemisesti autenttisten koulutehtävien tunnusmerkkejä, ja Gilbert (2004) keskittyi mallien ja mallintamisen rooliin autenttisessa tiedeopetuksessa.…”
Section: Tavoitteiden Tarkastelu Relevanssin Ja Autenttisuuden Näkökuunclassified
“…In fact, many students who complete introductory physics fail to view even physics itself as a coherent knowledge structure [1]. This failure suggests that after completing an introductory physics course students are almost certainly unable to meet the challenge [2] of relating the physics that they studied to phenomena encountered in other fields such as chemistry and biology. Furthermore, they are probably not able to approach, simplify, and quantify the complex systems characteristics of these fields with the tools offered by physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%