2010
DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0b013e31820eddbe
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disasters and Perinatal Health: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Background The empirical literature on the effects of disaster on pregnancy and the postpartum period is limited. The objective of this review was to examine the existing evidence on the effect of disasters on perinatal health. Methods A systematic review was conducted by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cinahl, PsycInfo), including literature on disasters and pregnancy outcomes (e.g., preterm birth, low birthweight, congenital anomalies), mental health, and child development. 110 articles we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
211
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
13
211
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies of terrorist attacks 4 -9) , nuclear reactor accidents 10 -16) , and natural disasters (earthquakes 17 -20) and hurricanes 21,22) ) have been identified. Disasters of various types may affect on fetal growth, although there is no clear causal link to shortened gestation or preterm birth 3) . The objective of this report is to describe some results of a pregnancy and birth survey after the disaster based on questionnaires from the Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies of terrorist attacks 4 -9) , nuclear reactor accidents 10 -16) , and natural disasters (earthquakes 17 -20) and hurricanes 21,22) ) have been identified. Disasters of various types may affect on fetal growth, although there is no clear causal link to shortened gestation or preterm birth 3) . The objective of this report is to describe some results of a pregnancy and birth survey after the disaster based on questionnaires from the Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, disasters potentially influence a range of reproductive and birth outcomes. Even without direct exposure to a disaster, circumstances may lead to an increased risk of adverse outcomes, -for instance, more unplanned pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections 3) . However, the literature on disasters indicates limited effects on birth outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies on the effects of various disasters (including natural and human -made disasters) on maternal mental health have indicated that pregnant and postpartum women may be especially vulnerable 6) . Examples include a study after the World Trade Center disaster, which reported that pregnant women attacked directly were more likely to be depressive 15) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequencies of abortions and miscarriages were reported not to have increased 4) . However, negative mental health consequences of mothers were reported after the Chernobyl accident 5) , and other disasters such as terrorist attacks, environmental disasters, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters 6) . These investigations demonstrated that pregnant and postpartum women are vulnerable to the effects of disaster on mental health, however, as of yet there is no research on the effects of disaster on women experiencing fetal loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pregnant women are at increased risk for adverse health effects both during and after a disaster event due to their condition (Harville et al 2010;Nour 2011). Psychological and physiological stress, trauma, reduced access to health facilities and to medication, and disruption in prenatal services are some potential risk factors for pregnant women from disasters, and these adverse effects are likely to also affect the unborn child.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%