2016
DOI: 10.1177/1526602816683933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy vs Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Isolated Popliteal Artery Lesions

Abstract: In this study, the use of DAART was associated with a higher primary patency rate compared with DCB angioplasty for isolated popliteal lesions. Nonetheless, both treatment options were associated with excellent 12-month secondary patency. Aneurysmal degeneration of the popliteal artery and increased bailout stenting could compromise the outcomes of DAART and DCB, respectively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 A comparative study was published in 2017 with 31 patients treated with DCBs and 41 patients with DAART for isolated lesions of the popliteal artery. 23 The 1-year primary patency was higher in patients treated with DAART (82% vs. 65%; hazard ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 6.37, P ¼ 0.021), and secondary patency was the same between the 2 modalities at 96%. The rate of popliteal occlusion was similar to that presented in our investigation (36% DCB, 44% DAART, 42% our study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…22 A comparative study was published in 2017 with 31 patients treated with DCBs and 41 patients with DAART for isolated lesions of the popliteal artery. 23 The 1-year primary patency was higher in patients treated with DAART (82% vs. 65%; hazard ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.09 to 6.37, P ¼ 0.021), and secondary patency was the same between the 2 modalities at 96%. The rate of popliteal occlusion was similar to that presented in our investigation (36% DCB, 44% DAART, 42% our study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Nonetheless, both the current literature and the findings of this real-world IN.PACT Global Study suggest that the unique anatomical environment in which the popliteal artery is embedded possesses different challenges compared to the proximal and middle SFA. 63 It remains, however, difficult to explain why lesions affecting both the SFA and the popliteal artery performed worse than isolated SFA or popliteal disease. We assume that a geometrical mismatch might play a vital role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Our group reported on the directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy (DAART) versus DCB angioplasty for isolated popliteal lesions. 10 In that study, 41 patients were treated with DAART, including the TurboHawk atherectomy catheter (Medtronic), the SilverHawk (Medtronic) peripheral plaque excision system and the HawkOne atherectomy device (Medtronic); and the Pantheris optical coherence tomography atherectomy catheter (Avinger) and 31 with DCB angioplasty only. The results showed a higher technical success rate (93% versus 84%, p=0.24) and primary patency rate at 6 months with DAART (95% versus 79%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%