2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2828799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direction-of-Arrival Estimation With ULA: A Spatial Annihilating Filter Reconstruction Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now we need to reconstruct the filter h by solving the optimization problem in (25). Although the first constraint in ( 25) is nonlinear with h and there is another unknown vector variable ν in the optimization problem, ( 25) is able to be perfectly solved by the MMV-STLN approach [30] which is a variation of the classical STLN approach [33]- [35].…”
Section: Filter Reconstruction For Wideband Doa Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we need to reconstruct the filter h by solving the optimization problem in (25). Although the first constraint in ( 25) is nonlinear with h and there is another unknown vector variable ν in the optimization problem, ( 25) is able to be perfectly solved by the MMV-STLN approach [30] which is a variation of the classical STLN approach [33]- [35].…”
Section: Filter Reconstruction For Wideband Doa Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Start the iteration calculation, and in each iteration solve the stand linear equality constrained LS problem in (27) and update h and ν through (28). 4) Estimate the DOAs using (30) after the convergence of the iteration.…”
Section: Filter Reconstruction For Wideband Doa Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since x[n] in ( 7) can be seen as the output of the virtual array with Vandermonde manifold, it can be annihilated by a spatial annihilating filter and the DOAs can be obtained from the filter coefficients [21]. Consider filter whose coefficient vector is denoted by…”
Section: Spatial Annihilating For Mst Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, that method requires the pseudoinverse of the array sampling matrix therein should be a left inverse, which means the array sampling matrix cannot be a fat matrix (more columns than rows) and will limit the order of the Fourier basis, leading to a non-negligible model truncation error. Spatial annihilating filter reconstruction is another DOA estimation method originally designed for ULA and it is equivalent to the deterministic maximum likelihood (DML) estimator of DOA [20], which ensures that it performs well both for coherent sources and under low SNR and limited snapshots scenarios [21]. In this paper, we extend the spatial annihilating filter reconstruction method to the arbitrary array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In structured EIV problems, the regression matrix has a given structure that depends on the problem formulation. Hankel, Toeplitz, or other application-specific matrices appear in problems of metrology Markovsky (2015), system 5 identification Söderström (2007), image restoration Feiz and Rezghi (2017), nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Cai et al (2016), direction-of-arrival estimation Pan et al (2018), and time-of-arrival estimation Jia et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%