2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4922118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direction dependent thermal conductivity of monolayer phosphorene: Parameterization of Stillinger-Weber potential and molecular dynamics study

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inMolecular dynamics simulations of single-layer molybdenum disulphide (MoS2): Stillinger-Weber parametrization, mechanical properties, and thermal conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
77
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(57 reference statements)
11
77
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A few classical molecular dynamics simulations have been performed to calculate in-plane thermal conductivity of monolayer BP. [ 17,28,29 ] Although the anisotropic thermal conductivity is observed in these studies, the thermal conductivity is found to change more than an order of magnitude depending on the empirical interatomic potentials employed. Alternatively, fi rst-principles-based thermal conductivity calculation methods have been proposed recently and have been demonstrated to be able to predict the thermal conductivity of many materials without any adjustable parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A few classical molecular dynamics simulations have been performed to calculate in-plane thermal conductivity of monolayer BP. [ 17,28,29 ] Although the anisotropic thermal conductivity is observed in these studies, the thermal conductivity is found to change more than an order of magnitude depending on the empirical interatomic potentials employed. Alternatively, fi rst-principles-based thermal conductivity calculation methods have been proposed recently and have been demonstrated to be able to predict the thermal conductivity of many materials without any adjustable parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Their results differ largely with each other, although the exactly same method of the single relaxation time approximation (RTA) for solving Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) is employed . Following that, the thermal conductivity of phosphorene has been reported theoretically by lots of studies from different methods, such as the analytical estimation, the classical MD simulations using the phosphorene‐targeted‐optimized Stillinger–Weber (SW) potential, RTA and iterative method for solving the phonon BTE . However, it still remains unclear for the exact value of thermal conductivity of phosphorene, since the results reported previously differ from each other at one order of magnitude as shown in Figure .…”
Section: Thermal Transport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it still remains unclear for the exact value of thermal conductivity of phosphorene, since the results reported previously differ from each other at one order of magnitude as shown in Figure . For instance, the thermal conductivity ranges from 30 to 152.7 Wm −1 K −1 along the zigzag direction, while ranges from 9.9 to 63.9 Wm −1 K −1 along the armchair direction . The huge deviation could be attributed to the different parameters or the different calculation methods, but the underlying mechanism remains largely unclear.…”
Section: Thermal Transport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the results obtained differ with each other unacceptably by even one order of magnitude. [12][13][14][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] It is also claimed for phosphorene that there exists a size-dependent κ along the zigzag direction, which is similar to graphene. 12 Based on the proposed strategy, we show clearly in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%