2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directing spatial attention in mental representations: Interactions between attentional orienting and working-memory load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
133
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
34
133
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, support for overflow has come from experiments employing other paradigms [8,9,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. This article assesses the argument for overflow in light of these recent contributions, arguing that rich perceptual contents comport better with the evidence than sparse contents.…”
Section: Glossarymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, support for overflow has come from experiments employing other paradigms [8,9,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. This article assesses the argument for overflow in light of these recent contributions, arguing that rich perceptual contents comport better with the evidence than sparse contents.…”
Section: Glossarymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Three forms of visual short-term memory A number of laboratories have shown that cues presented up to 12 seconds after an array has disappeared can enhance memory for the array [4,39,[55][56][57]. This technique has been exploited most impressively by a group at the University of Amsterdam that has amassed evidence for a third form of memory, 'fragile visual short-term memory' (fragile VSTM) [8,9,36,37,60], in addition to iconic and working memory (see Figure 4a for a depiction of the basic experimental procedure employed by this group).…”
Section: Trends In Cognitive Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The engagement of this frontal-parietal oculomotor network in orienting, together with other task-appropriate areas, has been observed in a variety of spatial and nonspatial orienting tasks, including orienting to semantic categories (Cristescu et al, 2006) and to scenes in long-term (Summerfield et al, 2006) or working memory (Lepsien et al, 2005). The activations in each task com- Figure 3.…”
Section: Shared and Task-biased Activity In The Cortexmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have shown that whereas visual WM for multiple items is fragile, memory representation for a single item is more robust (Makovski & Jiang, 2007). In particular, if participants are given a cue during the retention interval about which item will be tested, they can focus on the memory of that item and refresh its representation (Griffin & Nobre, 2003;Landman et al, 2003;Lepsien, Griffin, Devlin, & Nobre, 2005;Lepsien & Nobre, 2007;Makovski & Jiang, 2007). This leads to higher performance and greater resistance to interference Matsukura, Luck, & Vecera, 2007;Sligte et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%