Directed Technical Change and Energy Intensity Dynamics: Structural Change vs. Energy Efficiency

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract This paper uses a theoretical model with Directed Technical Change to analyse the observed heterogeneous energy intensity developments. Based on the empirical evidence on the underlying drivers of energy intensity developments, we decompose changes in aggregate energy intensity into structural changes in the economy (Sector Effect) and within-sector energy efficiency improvements (Efficiency Effect). We analyse how energy price growth and the relative productivity of both sectors affect the direction of research and hence the relative importance of the aforementioned two effects. The relative importance of these effects is determined by energy price growth and relative sector productivity that drive the direction of research. In economies that are relatively more advanced in sectors with low energy intensities, the Sector Effect dominates energy intensity dynamics given no or moderate energy price growth. In contrast, the Efficiency Effect dominates energy intensity developments in economies with a high relative technological level within their energy-intensive industries if moderate energy price growth is above a certain threshold. We further show that temporal energy price shocks might induce a permanent redirection of innovation activities towards sectors with low-energy intensities. Terms of use: Documents inKeywords: directed technical change, energy efficiency, energy intensity, structural change.JEL-Classification: O33, Q43, Q55. * We thank Jürgen Meckl, Ulf Moslener, Jana Brandt, Lothar Grall, Matthias Greiff, and the participants of the 9th MAGKS Colloquium (Marburg) for fruitful comments.

Artificial intelligence and energy intensity in China’s industrial sector: Effect and transmission channel

“…These expectations notwithstanding, AI also has some noneconomic consequences that have both positive and negative impacts on energy consumption (Vinuesa et al 2020), resulting in an uncertain impact on energy intensity. More specifically, by replacing and supplementing the physical and brain power of humans, AI may boost technological progress, and this is the primary driver of AI-related reductions in energy intensity (Haas and Kempa, 2016;Brynjolfsson et al, 2017). Nonetheless, compared to energy-consuming technologies such as machine learning and industrial robotics, the physical and brain power of humans is incredibly efficient and involves far less energy consumption, while AI research and applications such as deep learning platforms demand large amounts of energy (Lu et al, 2018;Vinuesa et al, 2020).…”

The Impact of the New Energy Demonstration City Construction on Energy Consumption Intensity: Exploring the Sustainable Potential of China's Firms

“…Previous literature has explored the determinants of energy consumption intensity. Scholars have investigated the influencing factors from energy structure [13], energy price [14][15][16], industrial structure [17][18][19], industrial intellectualization [20], urbanization [21][22][23][24], financial development [25,26], and technological progress [18,27,28]. Furthermore, from the environmental policy perspectives, some studies have investigated the influence of environmental regulations on energy consumption intensity at the macro and micro levels.…”