2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2007.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct tunneling effective mass of electrons determined by intrinsic charge-up process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The I-V curves are well described by the Fowler-Nordheim field-enhanced tunneling law 17 with effective energy barrier heights of 1.4 and 1.9 eV for Si-NC and Si-NC:Er LED, respectively (assuming an effective electron mass of 0.3 m 0 ). 20 The Er-doped device is less conductive than the undoped device, which we ascribe to charge trapping at deep energy levels due to Er ion implantation. 21 This is also supported by the C-V measurements (Fig.…”
Section: A Direct Current Excitationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The I-V curves are well described by the Fowler-Nordheim field-enhanced tunneling law 17 with effective energy barrier heights of 1.4 and 1.9 eV for Si-NC and Si-NC:Er LED, respectively (assuming an effective electron mass of 0.3 m 0 ). 20 The Er-doped device is less conductive than the undoped device, which we ascribe to charge trapping at deep energy levels due to Er ion implantation. 21 This is also supported by the C-V measurements (Fig.…”
Section: A Direct Current Excitationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Light soaking increases the average value of this negative Q fix to −4.85 × 10 12  cm −2 43. DFT calculations show that F vacancies are acceptor type defects which can localize electrons originating from Si and tunnelling though SiO 2 42434445, yielding a negative Q fix . We note here that O was not present in AlF x nor did the ultrathin SiO 2 layer on the Si wafer contain excess O43.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Watanabe et al pointed out that besides the used method the treatment of the Si/SiO 2 transition, whether it is assumed as an abrupt transition or with an interfacial transition layer, significantly influences the resulting tunneling mass [31]. In more recent works, values of 0.3 [32] to 0.58 m 0 [33] were presented.…”
Section: Tunneling and Tunneling Massmentioning
confidence: 99%