2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-022-01274-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct serendipity and mixed finite elements on convex quadrilaterals

Abstract: The classical serendipity and mixed finite element spaces suffer from poor approximation on nondegenerate, convex quadrilaterals. In this paper, we develop families of direct serendipity and direct mixed finite element spaces, which achieve optimal approximation properties and have minimal local dimension. The set of local shape functions for either the serendipity or mixed elements contains the full set of scalar or vector polynomials of degree r, respectively, defined directly on each element (i.e., not mapp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it follows from the construction that we obtain global H 1 conforming elements by just matching vertex and edge DoFs on the boundaries of the elements; that is, local basis functions merge together continuously to give a global nodal basis for DS r = DS r ( ) ⊂ H 1 ( ). Our construction directly extends that given in [5] for the case N = 4.…”
Section: Unisolvence and Conformity Of The Finite Elementsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, it follows from the construction that we obtain global H 1 conforming elements by just matching vertex and edge DoFs on the boundaries of the elements; that is, local basis functions merge together continuously to give a global nodal basis for DS r = DS r ( ) ⊂ H 1 ( ). Our construction directly extends that given in [5] for the case N = 4.…”
Section: Unisolvence and Conformity Of The Finite Elementsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The proof follows closely that given in [5] for the quadrilateral case and so is omitted here except for discussion of one important issue. The proof uses a continuous dependence argument, relying on the fact that the set of vertices lies in a compact set as well as Assumption 5.1, which ensures that the construction of the finite elements on E N depends continuously on its vertices.…”
Section: Approximation Properties Of Ds Rmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations