1982
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-1982-0645663-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct secant updates of matrix factorizations

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents a new context for using the sparse Broyden update method to solve systems of nonlinear equations. The setting for this work is that a Newton-like algorithm is assumed to be available which incorporates a workable strategy for improving poor initial guesses and providing a satisfactory Jacobian matrix approximation whenever required. The total cost of obtaining each Jacobian matrix, or the cost of factoring it to solve for the Newton step, is assumed to be sufficiently high to make… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is particularly beneficial when it is expensive to compute X and/or when it is desirable to obtain as great a reduction in Φ as possible given one or perhaps two iterations. Indeed, Dennis and Marwil [1982] indicate that use of such an update may be most fruitful when the cost of obtaining a full new Jacobian is sufficiently high: as a result, they recommend that the use of such an update is most effective between reevaluations of X .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is particularly beneficial when it is expensive to compute X and/or when it is desirable to obtain as great a reduction in Φ as possible given one or perhaps two iterations. Indeed, Dennis and Marwil [1982] indicate that use of such an update may be most fruitful when the cost of obtaining a full new Jacobian is sufficiently high: as a result, they recommend that the use of such an update is most effective between reevaluations of X .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entretanto, nas últimas duas décadas, alguns autores introduziram algoritmos que, embora pareçam não ter esta propriedade, ainda assim apresentam bom desempenho prático. Entre eles, podemos citar os métodos introduzidos por Tewarson [54], Tewarson e Zhang [55], Dennis e Marwil [15) e Martínez [38). Gomes-Ruggiero e Martínez [27] mostraram que o "Column-Updating method" (CUM) introduzido em Martínez [39) é muito efetivo quando comparado com a implementação do primeiro método de Broyden com memória limitada (Gomes-Ruggiero, Martínez e Moretti [28), Griewank [30), Matthies e Strang [46]) na resolução de sistemas não lineares de grande porte.…”
Section: Introduçaounclassified