2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Reprogramming of Murine Fibroblasts to Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells

Abstract: SummaryRecent reports have shown that somatic cells, under appropriate culture conditions, could be directly reprogrammed to cardiac, hepatic, or neuronal phenotype by lineage-specific transcription factors. In this study, we demonstrate that both embryonic and adult somatic fibroblasts can be efficiently reprogrammed to clonal multilineage hematopoietic progenitors by the ectopic expression of the transcription factors ERG, GATA2, LMO2, RUNX1c, and SCL. These reprogrammed cells were stably expanded on stromal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
146
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
146
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative transcriptomics of HSC and progenitor cell populations often provided lists of candidate factors to overexpress. Although many of the factors used in reprogramming studies have previously been implicated in developmental haematopoiesis, their true 'haematopoietic potency' becomes unveiled when they are expressed in a foreign cellular context, such as when reprogramming fibroblasts Batta et al, 2014) or undifferentiated PSCs (Elcheva et al, 2014;Vereide et al, 2014) (see Fig. 5 for details).…”
Section: Direct Cell Lineage Conversion: Programming and Reprogramminmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparative transcriptomics of HSC and progenitor cell populations often provided lists of candidate factors to overexpress. Although many of the factors used in reprogramming studies have previously been implicated in developmental haematopoiesis, their true 'haematopoietic potency' becomes unveiled when they are expressed in a foreign cellular context, such as when reprogramming fibroblasts Batta et al, 2014) or undifferentiated PSCs (Elcheva et al, 2014;Vereide et al, 2014) (see Fig. 5 for details).…”
Section: Direct Cell Lineage Conversion: Programming and Reprogramminmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the safest HSCs generated in the dish would likely be genetically unaltered cells, produced by exposure to external factors equivalent to the embryonic cues that drive HSC development. Here, the bottleneck seems to be identifying the combinations of soluble and cell-based factors and (Vereide et al, 2014); (2) (Kyba et al, 2002;Lu et al, 2016); (3) ; (4) (Elcheva et al, 2014); note that GATA2/ SCL combination induces erythro-megakaryocytic differentiation (not shown); (5) (Sandler et al, 2014); (6) (Riddell et al, 2014); (7) ; (8) (Batta et al, 2014); (9) (Cheng et al, 2016); (10) (Pulecio et al, 2014); (11) (Lis et al, 2017); (12) (Sugimura et al, 2017). CLPs, common lymphoid progenitors; CMPs, common myeloid progenitors; MPPs, multipotent progenitors.…”
Section: Future Directions and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With these datasets, investigators are able to generate candidate genes which may be capable of direct conversion as well as use defined lineage specific networks as a benchmark for proper lineage reprogramming. Many of these rely on a study of the gene expression networks in the target cells to confirm proper lineage conversion including hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (iHSC, iHPC, [4,73,85]), embryonic sertoli-like cells (ieSCs, [13]), endothelial cells (iECs, [33]), and melanocytes (iMels, [101]). …”
Section: Other Direct Reprogramming Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, direct reprogramming should be improved in order to produce proliferating cells such as tissue specific stem cells or progenitor cells more than fully differentiated cells. In fact, some kinds of stem cells as well as progenitor cells were produced by direct reprogramming technology, including neural stem cells or progenitors (Han et al, 2012;Schindeler et al, 2015;Thier et al, 2012), oligodendrocyte precursor cells (Najm et al, 2013), hepatic stem cells , HSCs (Riddell et al, 2014), and hematopoietic multipotent progenitors (Batta et al, 2014;Sandler et al, 2014).…”
Section: Pluripotency Factors For Indirect Reprogrammingmentioning
confidence: 99%