Abstract-Abnormalities in whole blood viscosity (WBV) have been implicated in hypertension. This study analyzes relations between WBV and blood pressure in the Strong Heart Study population of American Indians. We examined 676 participants (489 women, age 62Ϯ7 years) without prevalent cardiovascular disease or use of antihypertensive medications, digoxin, or aspirin. WBV was calculated from hematocrit and plasma protein concentration, at a shear rate of 208 seconds
Ϫ1, by a validated equation. Forty eight percent of participants were obese, 43% had diabetes, 19% had hypertension, and 30% were current smokers. WBV was higher in men, smokers, and participants with central obesity, but it was not associated with hypertension or diabetes, even accounting for confounders. After adjusting for gender, age, center, smoking, obesity, diabetes, and plasma creatinine, WBV was negatively related to pulse pressure (ϭϪ0.13; PϽ0.001) and systolic pressure (ϭϪ0.09; PϽ0.02), mainly because of negative relations with hematocrit (ϭϪ0.11 and Ϫ0.10). Among hypertensive individuals, pulse pressure was positively related to age, diabetes, and female gender but not to WBV (multiple Rϭ0.63; PϽ0.0001); in contrast, in normotensive individuals, pulse pressure was related negatively to WBV or hematocrit, independent of body mass index, without relation to diabetes (Rϭ0.42; PϽ0.0001). Thus, under normal physiological conditions, in vivo WBV is negatively related pulse pressure. In contrast, the presence of arterial hypertension makes this relation less evident. Abnormalities in blood viscosity have been implicated in a number of cardiovascular diseases. 1-3 Given the direct role of whole blood viscosity (WBV) in determining vascular resistance, recognized by Poiseuille, 4 there is interest in possible relations between viscosity and hypertension. 5-11 A study performed in normotensive subjects 6 demonstrated an independent association of WBV with diastolic or mean blood pressure, but not with systolic pressure, giving support to further research to investigate possible relations of WBV with hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors. However, most mechanisms remain unclear. 10 Unfortunately, direct determination of in vitro WBV is technically demanding and difficult to apply in epidemiological studies. We have previously shown that up to 83% of variability of WBV could be explained by microhematocrit and total plasma protein concentration (as a surrogate of plasma viscosity) over a range of shear rates from 0.1 to 208 seconds Ϫ1 .
6Relations between blood pressure and rheological components or WBV have rarely been studied in general populations. 12,13 The Strong Heart Study is a population-based longitudinal survey in American Indians, an ethnic group with higher prevalence of obesity and diabetes than in previous studies on WBV, which provides an opportunity to investigate cross-sectional associations between blood pressure and estimated WBV in the presence of these increasingly prevalent cardiovascular risk factors, without con...