Direct reflectance transformation methodology for drone-based hyperspectral imaging

Abstract

Multi-and hyperspectral cameras on drones can be valuable tools in environmental monitoring. A significant shortcoming complicating their usage in quantitative remote sensing applications is insufficient robust radiometric calibration methods. In a direct reflectance transformation method, the drone is equipped with a camera and an irradiance sensor, allowing transformation of image pixel values to reflectance factors without ground reference data. This method requires the sensors to be calibrated with higher accuracy than what is usually required by the empirical line method (ELM), but consequently it offers benefits in robustness, ease of operation, and ability to be used on Beyond-Visual Line of Sight flights. The objective of this study was to develop and assess a drone-based workflow for direct reflectance transformation and implement it on our hyperspectral remote sensing system. A novel atmospheric correction method is also introduced, using two reference panels, but, unlike in the ELM, the correction is not directly affected by changes in the illumination. The sensor system consists of a hyperspectral camera (Rikola HSI, by Senop) and an onboard irradiance spectrometer (FGI AIRS), which were both given thorough radiometric calibrations. In laboratory tests and in a flight experiment, the FGI AIRS tilt-corrected irradiances had accuracy better than 1.9% at solar zenith angles up to 70 • . The system's lowaltitude reflectance factor accuracy was assessed in a flight experiment using reflectance reference panels, where the normalized root mean square errors (NRMSE) were less than ±2% for the light panels (25% and 50%) and less than ±4% for the dark panels (5% and 10%). In the high-altitude images, taken at 100-150 m altitude, the NRMSEs without atmospheric correction were within 1.4%-8.7% for VIS bands and 2.0%-18.5% for NIR bands. Significant atmospheric effects appeared already at 50 m flight altitude. The proposed atmospheric correction was found to be practical and it decreased the high-altitude NRMSEs to 1.3%-2.6% for VIS bands and to 2.3%-5.3% for NIR bands. Overall, the workflow was found to be efficient and to provide similar accuracies as the ELM, but providing operational advantages in such challenging scenarios as in forest monitoring, large-scale autonomous mapping tasks, and real-time applications. Tests in varying illumination conditions showed that the reflectance factors of the gravel and vegetation targets varied up to 8% between sunny and cloudy conditions due to reflectance anisotropy effects, while the direct reflectance workflow had better accuracy. This suggests that the varying illumination conditions have to be further accounted for in drone-based in quantitative remote sensing applications.

Multispectral Imagery Provides Benefits for Mapping Spruce Tree Decline Due to Bark Beetle Infestation When Acquired Late in the Season

“…The recent review by Aasen et al [43] suggested various techniques for radiometric processing. The state-of-the-art techniques provide tools for atmospheric correction [44,45]. However, the methods for accounting for the reflectance anisotropy are still missing from most of the presented processing chains; one of the existing solutions is the radiometric block adjustment presented by Honkavaara et al [46].…”

A New Method for Estimating Signal-to-Noise Ratio in UAV Hyperspectral Images Based on Pure Pixel Extraction

“…The preprocessing steps of Rikola hyperspectral image mainly include [25], [26]: 1) Format conversion and dark current correction (using Hyperspectral Imager software); 2) Bands registration (using RegMosaic software); 3) Image mosaic (using Agisoft Photoscan Professional software).…”

Monitoring Seasonal Morphobathymetric Change of Nearshore Seafloor Using Drone-Based Multispectral Imagery

“…A particular advantage of drone imagery over satellite/airborne imagery regarding shallow-water inversion is the fact that the first does not require atmospheric correction. The atmospheric effects on drone-based imagery are considered minor for bright targets in the visible spectrum and when images are taken from less than 150 m altitude under favorable weather conditions (Suomalainen et al, 2021). However, the use of a calibration reflectance panel is required for obtaining reflectance values adjusted for incoming radiance.…”