The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1179/1362171815y.0000000052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct quality prediction in resistance spot welding process: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy comparative analysis

Abstract: In this work, several of the most popular and state-of-the-art classification methods are compared as pattern recognition tools for classification of resistance spot welding joints. Instead of using the result of a non-destructive testing technique as input variables, classifiers are trained directly with the relevant welding parameters, i.e. welding current, welding time and the type of electrode (electrode material and treatment). The algorithms are compared in terms of accuracy and area under the receiver o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RSW holds a promising optimization potential as a result of the balance that it establishes between cost and performance; remarkably, the tendency in the automotive industry is to reduce the number of RSW joints per vehicle, which makes the accuracy of the tools to assist in the quality control of RSW joints [10] more critical, as the fewer the RSW joints per vehicle, the stronger the requirements for each of them [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSW holds a promising optimization potential as a result of the balance that it establishes between cost and performance; remarkably, the tendency in the automotive industry is to reduce the number of RSW joints per vehicle, which makes the accuracy of the tools to assist in the quality control of RSW joints [10] more critical, as the fewer the RSW joints per vehicle, the stronger the requirements for each of them [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the methods used for machine learning modelling can be classified as classical machine learning methods (LaCasse et al 2019), like Linear Regression (LR) (Cho and Rhee 2002;Martín et al 2009;Panchakshari and Kadam 2013), Polynomial Regression (PolyR) (Pashazadeh et al 2016;, or Generalised Linear Models (GLM) Gavidel et al (2019), k-Nearest Neighbours (kNN) (Haapalainen et al 2005;Koskimaki et al 2007;Boersch et al 2016), Decision Trees (DT) (Zhang et al 2015;Kim and Ahmed 2018), Random Forests (RF) (Pereda et al 2015;Boersch et al 2016), Support Vector Machines (SVM), etc. Statistic methods like Linear or Quadratic Discriminate Analysis (LDA and QDA) are also used for classification.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, the control improvements about double-wire GMAW process were a bit limited when compared to other forms of GMAW process. By means of serious researching relative improvements used in other forms of GMAW process, the future improvements about this process will be more and more improved, especially can employ artificial intelligent tools [56], [57] for process analysis and control, or technique innovations, such as bypass coupling technology, and so on.…”
Section: Improvement Of Process Control Of the Double-wire Gmaw Processmentioning
confidence: 99%