2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0052453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct numerical simulation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression–decompression corner

Abstract: A direct numerical simulation of the interaction between a shock wave and the supersonic turbulent boundary layer in a compression–decompression corner with a fixed 24° deflection angle at Mach 2.9 is conducted. The characteristics of the shock interactions are investigated for two heights between the compression and decompression corners, corresponding to H/δref=4.25, 1.22, where δref denotes the reference turbulent boundary layer thickness. A classic shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction flow is re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…profiles of fluctuations in various velocity components are plotted in figure 25( a ), which are qualitatively similar to those presented by Wu & Moin (2009) and Duan et al. (2021) for supersonic flat plate boundary layers. While all fluctuations display similar behaviour in both the geometries near the wall (), fluctuations attain higher amplitudes away from the wall in the notched geometry.…”
Section: Effect On Isolator Flowsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…profiles of fluctuations in various velocity components are plotted in figure 25( a ), which are qualitatively similar to those presented by Wu & Moin (2009) and Duan et al. (2021) for supersonic flat plate boundary layers. While all fluctuations display similar behaviour in both the geometries near the wall (), fluctuations attain higher amplitudes away from the wall in the notched geometry.…”
Section: Effect On Isolator Flowsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In the present DNS, an in-house high-order finite difference code (OpenCFD-SC) (Duan et al. 2021; Dang et al. 2022; Xu, Wang & Chen 2023 b ) is applied, and it has been used successfully in many supersonic/hypersonic SWTBLI studies (Zhu et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present DNS, an in-house high-order finite difference code (OpenCFD-SC) (Duan et al 2021;Dang et al 2022;Xu, Wang & Chen 2023b) is applied, and it has been used successfully in many supersonic/hypersonic SWTBLI studies (Zhu et al 2017;Duan et al 2021;Tong et al 2023). The DNS code solves the three-dimensional unsteady compressible Navier-Stokes equations in a generalized coordinate system via the high-order finite difference method.…”
Section: Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2022) and Duan et al. (2021). Figure 1( a – c ) are given to show the instantaneous streamwise velocity, temperature and density fields.…”
Section: Basic Characteristics Of the Flowmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The settings of simulation parameters are similar to the plate TBL in the compression ramp of Dang et al (2022) and Duan et al (2021). Figure 1(a-c) are given to show the instantaneous streamwise velocity, temperature and density fields.…”
Section: Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%