2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct measures of digital information processing and communication skills in primary education: Using item response theory for the development and validation of an ICT competence scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
71
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is in line with the requirements in national curricula that relate to students' digital literacy as being composed of several facets (e.g., Aesaert et al 2014;Claro et al 2012;Ferrari 2013). We therefore consider CSE to be multidimensional and aligned with the specific facets of digital literacy.…”
Section: Teachers' Computer Self-efficacy (Cse)mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach is in line with the requirements in national curricula that relate to students' digital literacy as being composed of several facets (e.g., Aesaert et al 2014;Claro et al 2012;Ferrari 2013). We therefore consider CSE to be multidimensional and aligned with the specific facets of digital literacy.…”
Section: Teachers' Computer Self-efficacy (Cse)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Frameworks on students' digital competence comprise several facets, and most of the frameworks share common dimensions focusing on different activities of handling digital information (e.g., searching, accessing, evaluating, sharing and communicating digital information; Claro et al 2012;Ferrari 2013;Gallardo-Echenique et al 2015). Moreover, since a number of studies indicated that students struggle within this area and lack skills related to information retrieval and information processing (e.g., Aesaert et al 2014;Kuiper et al 2005), there is a pressing need for fostering these skills in the classroom. As a consequence, focusing on TEDDICS may provide information on potential opportunities to address this need.…”
Section: Teachers' Emphasis On Developing Students' Digital Informatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, testing data for fit to the Rasch model is rarely done for questionnaire scales on use of technology (cf. Aesaert, Van Nijlen, Vanderlinde, & van Braak, 2014) and, to our knowledge, no comprehensive instruments that assess support to prepare future teachers for technology integration have been described in the research literature.…”
Section: Purpose Of the Study: Measuring Strategies To Prepare Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding this competence area, most of the frameworks distinguish between search, evaluation, and communication processes (Calvani, Cartelli, Fini, & Ranieri, 2009;Ferrari, 2013;Fraillon, Schulz, & Ainley, 2013;International ICT Literacy Panel, 2007). In addition, research on the operationalization of digital information skills tends to keep this distinction and indicates that students lack these skills and experience problems related to information retrieval and processing skills (e.g., defining proper search queries, evaluating information, presenting and communicating information in non-structured digital environments; Aesaert, Nijlen, Vanderlinde, & van Braak, 2014;Calvani, Fini, Ranieri, & Picci, 2012;Kuiper, Volman, & Terwel, 2005). In sum, distinguishing between the different skills involved in mastering digital information (i.e., accessing, evaluating, sharing and communicating; e.g., Ferrari, 2013) may provide a conceptual framework for describing teachers' emphasis on the development of these skills in their classrooms.…”
Section: Students' Digital Information and Communication Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%