2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct measurements of interfacial shear strength of multi-walled carbon nanotube/PEEK composite using a nano-pullout method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
69
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible reason is that the interfacial shear strength used in this estimation (20 MPa) is too high. The authors have evaluated the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of CNT/PEEK and CNT/epoxy composites using a nano-pullout method [38]. Results show that the IFSS of specimens after tensile testing decreased as compared with pristine specimens.…”
Section: Estimation Of Cnt Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible reason is that the interfacial shear strength used in this estimation (20 MPa) is too high. The authors have evaluated the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of CNT/PEEK and CNT/epoxy composites using a nano-pullout method [38]. Results show that the IFSS of specimens after tensile testing decreased as compared with pristine specimens.…”
Section: Estimation Of Cnt Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that equation, R is the CNT diameter, R is the distance between each layer of CNTs (0.34 nm [38]) and L cr is the average fracture interval (44.6 m). The value of  interwall was stated in earlier reports of the literature [40][41][42].…”
Section: Estimation Of Multiple Fracture Of Cnt Under Tensile Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that the estimated tensile strength of the nanocomposite based on the shear lag model using the obtained IFSS values is consistent with the experimental ones. To date, the direct microscopic method for determination of IFSS values have also been employed for CNT-filled ceramic [160] and polymer [161] matrix nanocomposites. It is inferred that the tensile strength of the nanocomposites can be maximized by thickening the interfacial region through the formation of a crystalline coating around CNTs or their functionalization or in situ formation of metal oxide/carbide interlayer at boundary zones.…”
Section: Partial Chemical Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to experimentally measure and assess the interfacial strength of CFRPs, the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) test is important. Generally three techniques have been developed to evaluate the IFSS: the fragmentation test [22,23], pull-out test [24][25][26], and micro-bond test [27][28][29]. Among these, the microbond test has been one of the most extensively used methods to measure the IFSS between reinforcing fibers and polymers due to the simplicity of sample preparation and IFSS measurement [30,31].…”
Section: Measurement Of Wettability and Surface Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%