2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2009.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct measurement of contact area and stress dependence of anisotropic flow through rock fracture with heterogeneous aperture distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
74
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, various analytical equations, experimental tests and numerical methods have been proposed to quantify the aperture distribution and flow behavior in the fracture under normal and shear stresses. [8][9][10][11] Single fracture has been approximately modeled by using two smooth parallel plates that are separated by a constant distance, with the fluid flowing through it that follows the cubic law. 12,13 However, in the nature, the surfaces of most rock fractures are rough, which results in nonuniformly distributed aperture fields in fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, various analytical equations, experimental tests and numerical methods have been proposed to quantify the aperture distribution and flow behavior in the fracture under normal and shear stresses. [8][9][10][11] Single fracture has been approximately modeled by using two smooth parallel plates that are separated by a constant distance, with the fluid flowing through it that follows the cubic law. 12,13 However, in the nature, the surfaces of most rock fractures are rough, which results in nonuniformly distributed aperture fields in fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, quantification of fracture flow was performed by Indraratna et al (2015), who performed CFD simulations based on initial laser-scanning measurements, where the flow model is coupled with a deformation criteria simulating fracture closing. Similar, but more simplified, deformation procedures were performed for statistically derived aperture distributions (Pyrak-Nolte and Morris, 2000), profilometer measurements (Kim et al, 2003), laser-scan data (Nemoto et al, 2009;Watanabe et al, 2008Watanabe et al, , 2009) and a conceptual 2-D model (Liu et al, 2010). Furthermore, Dicman et al (2004) described changes in aperture distribution by combining laboratory data and stochastic approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods based on inserting or injecting some materials such as pressure-sensitive film (Nemoto et al 2009), special metal (Pyrak-Nolte et al 1987), or epoxy resin (Hakami and Larsson 1996) into the joint interface. The main problem in using pressure-sensitive film methods is the thickness of the material.…”
Section: Description Of the New Methods For Joint Surface Characterizamentioning
confidence: 99%