2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.156602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Mapping of Strain in a Strained Silicon Transistor by High-Resolution Electron Microscopy

Abstract: Aberration-corrected high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) is used to measure strain in a strained-silicon metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor. Strain components parallel and perpendicular to the gate are determined directly from the HRTEM image by geometric phase analysis. Si80Ge20 source and drain stressors lead to uniaxial compressive strain in the Si channel, reaching a maximum value of -1.3% just below the gate oxide, equivalent to 2.2 GPa. Strain maps obtained by linear e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
75
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,16 Initially, we performed full threedimensional simulations ͑150 nm thick͒ with free surfaces and a geometry that mimics that one revealed by TEM bright-field images ͓Fig. 1͑a͔͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,16 Initially, we performed full threedimensional simulations ͑150 nm thick͒ with free surfaces and a geometry that mimics that one revealed by TEM bright-field images ͓Fig. 1͑a͔͒.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Geometric phase analysis ͑GPA͒ of the HRTEM images 9 was used to directly map the distribution of zz Si , within the whole structures with nanometer resolution and high precision of 0.1%. 10,11 Image analysis was carried out using GPA Phase 2.0 ͑HREM Research, Inc.͒ a plug-in for the software package DigitalMicrograph ͑Gatan͒. Thin film relaxation was corrected for by assuming that strains were fully relaxed in the viewing direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) and geometric phase analysis (GPA) have been used previously by several groups for these types of measurements (Toda et al, 2001;Hÿtch et al, 2003;Benedetti et al, 2004;Toh et al, 2005;Chung et al, 2008;Hüe et al, 2008), there have been no reports directly comparing the strain measurements from the two techniques for the same device structure. Because there are relative advantages and limitations of these techniques for strain measurement, a direct comparison of these two techniques should provide a better understanding of these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%