2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2008.10.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct fabrication of three-dimensional buried conductive channels in single crystal diamond with ion microbeam induced graphitization

Abstract: We report on a novel method for the fabrication of three-dimensional buried graphitic micropaths in single crystal diamond with the employment of focused MeV ions. The use of implantation masks with graded thickness at the sub-micrometer scale allows the formation of conductive channels which are embedded in the insulating matrix at controllable depths. In particular, the modulation of the channels depth at their endpoints allows the surface contacting of the channel terminations with no need of further fabric… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in figure 2(b), the MeV ion implantation across such edges determines the formation of a highly damaged layer at a modulated depth, thus allowing the connection of the endpoint of the buried layer to the sample surface. The method described in this work represents a significant improvement over that reported in earlier works [42][43][44], allowing a reliable and reproducible lithographic process by means of variable-thickness masks with smoothly sloping edges, as reported in the profilometry scan reported in figure 2(c).…”
Section: Sample Masking For Ion Implantationmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in figure 2(b), the MeV ion implantation across such edges determines the formation of a highly damaged layer at a modulated depth, thus allowing the connection of the endpoint of the buried layer to the sample surface. The method described in this work represents a significant improvement over that reported in earlier works [42][43][44], allowing a reliable and reproducible lithographic process by means of variable-thickness masks with smoothly sloping edges, as reported in the profilometry scan reported in figure 2(c).…”
Section: Sample Masking For Ion Implantationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Cross-sectional TEM microscopy has been employed to directly image the emerging amorphized layers, which are formed upon the damage-induced conversion of the diamond lattice into a stable sp 2 phase, demonstrating the reliability of the variable-thickness masking technique, which has been optimized with respect to previous reports [42][43][44] to define amorphous structures in diamond with micrometric resolution in the three spatial dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considerable effort has been devoted in recent years to the application of high energy (MeV) ion implantation in the fabrication and functionalization of diamond, in particular with the aim of developing a series of micro-devices, ranging from bio-sensors and detectors to micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) and optical devices [1][2][3]. This can be achieved by exploiting the strongly non-uniform damage depth profile of MeV ions and creating specific regions where the diamond lattice structure is critically damaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] Depending upon implantation energy and ion species, this conducting layer will be a surface layer, or be buried under a thin, nearly pristine, single-crystal diamond skin; 2 however, making electrical contact through the insulating skin (∼50 nm at 150 keV) to the buried implant layer is not simple. A variety of techniques that achieve electrical contact by local conversion of the insulating diamond into a conducting medium are reported in the literature, such as: (1) Multiple ion implants, each at successively lower energies, 8 extend the conducting region from the buried layer to the surface; (2) Ion implantation into/through thin metal contacts or shaped masks 9,10 to laterally vary the depth of implantation damage from the buried layer to the surface; or (3) Pulsed laser conversion 11,12 of diamond channels to graphite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%