2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39565-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct evidence of substorm-related impulsive injections of electrons at Mercury

Abstract: Mercury’s magnetosphere is known to involve fundamental processes releasing particles and energy like at Earth due to the solar wind interaction. The resulting cycle is however much faster and involves acceleration, transport, loss, and recycling of plasma. Direct experimental evidence for the roles of electrons during this cycle is however missing. Here we show that in-situ plasma observations obtained during BepiColombo’s first Mercury flyby reveal a compressed magnetosphere hosts of quasi-periodic fluctuati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another analysis of the plasma instrument observation onboard Mio, Aizawa et al. (2023) identified the inbound magnetopause crossing at 23:08:30 and the outbound magnetopause crossing at 23:41. While the modeled inbound magnetopause is outside of the shown time range, they are encountered at around 23:18 for the pnp and npp cases and at around 23:20 for the pnn and npn cases.…”
Section: Model Results Along Spacecraft Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another analysis of the plasma instrument observation onboard Mio, Aizawa et al. (2023) identified the inbound magnetopause crossing at 23:08:30 and the outbound magnetopause crossing at 23:41. While the modeled inbound magnetopause is outside of the shown time range, they are encountered at around 23:18 for the pnp and npp cases and at around 23:20 for the pnn and npn cases.…”
Section: Model Results Along Spacecraft Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the observed outbound magnetopause crossings align better with our model results for the pnn and npn cases (orange and purple), we infer that the upstream IMF likely had a negative B Z,IMF component which led to a higher magnetic field erosion of the dayside magnetopause. However, this estimation relies on a nominal upstream solar wind dynamic pressure, which the data analysis does imply (Aizawa et al., 2023; Griton et al., 2023; Harada et al., 2022; Orsini et al., 2022). Similar data analysis for the MSB2 maneuver are still in progress in the community, so we limit our analysis to that under nominal upstream dynamic pressure conditions, the modeled inbound magnetopause is located at around 9:22 for the pnp, pnn and npp cases (green, orange and pink) and at around 9:24 for the npn cases (purple).…”
Section: Model Results Along Spacecraft Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetosphere of Mercury is much smaller than the terrestrial magnetosphere; thus, in some extreme solar wind conditions, dayside magnetic reconnection can strip all closed magnetic field lines at the equator and form an equatorial cusp region (Slavin et al, 2010). Because of the lack of atmosphere and ionosphere, it is not expected to have auroral substorms and the associated magnetospheric processes, although similar energy deposits may be found (Aizawa et al, 2023).…”
Section: A Brief History Of Magnetic Reconnection and Dipolarization ...mentioning
confidence: 99%