2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3432716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct evaluation of low-field mobility and access resistance in pentacene field-effect transistors

Abstract: Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) suffer from limitations such as low mobility of charge carriers and high access resistance. Direct and accurate evaluation of these quantities becomes crucial for understanding the OFETs properties. We introduce the Y function method (YFM) to pentacene OFETs. This method allows us to evaluate the low-field mobility without the access or contact resistance influence. The low-field mobility is shown to be more appropriate than the currently applied field-effect mobility f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
114
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,[11][12][13] As indicated in Fig. 1͑d͒ by solid curve, it satisfies well the empirical dependence R sd 14 where R sd0 , V 0 and ␤ are fitting parameters. R sd0 represents the intrinsic contact resistance level at V G − V 0 =1 V, V 0 denotes the gate voltage at which the channel begins to conduct below threshold and ␤ characterizes the gate voltage dependence of the contact resistance.…”
Section: Modified Transmission-line Methods For Contact Resistance Extmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…4,[11][12][13] As indicated in Fig. 1͑d͒ by solid curve, it satisfies well the empirical dependence R sd 14 where R sd0 , V 0 and ␤ are fitting parameters. R sd0 represents the intrinsic contact resistance level at V G − V 0 =1 V, V 0 denotes the gate voltage at which the channel begins to conduct below threshold and ␤ characterizes the gate voltage dependence of the contact resistance.…”
Section: Modified Transmission-line Methods For Contact Resistance Extmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…2a) [27]. If the transconductance ðg m ¼ ð@I d =@V g ÞÞ starts to decrease from a certain V g (usually for large values of V g and small channel lengths L), then the contact effect starts to dominate the m FET attenuation and R c as well as a contact-free transistor mobility can be extracted from the Y-function ðY ¼ ðI d = ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi g m p ÞÞ [27]. Because the Y-function method assumes a constant R c with V g , one should turn to TLM to extract R c at arbitrary values of V g (especially at large values of V g ).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Contact Injection In Ofetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Y-function method requires only one transfer scan (I d -V g ) of an individual device in linear regime with applying a small sourcedrain voltage (V d ( V g ) (Fig. 2a) [27]. If the transconductance ðg m ¼ ð@I d =@V g ÞÞ starts to decrease from a certain V g (usually for large values of V g and small channel lengths L), then the contact effect starts to dominate the m FET attenuation and R c as well as a contact-free transistor mobility can be extracted from the Y-function ðY ¼ ðI d = ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi g m p ÞÞ [27].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Contact Injection In Ofetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the S Id =I 2 D upswing at high I D is bigger for the BC device than for the TC one, which has a lower contact resistance than its BC counterpart (cf. The contact resistances in TC and BC devices have been extracted using the transmission-line method (TLM) [21,22] and was found to vary with V G following an empirical expression R sd (V G ) = R sd0 (V G À V 0 ) Àb , where R sd0 , V 0 and b are fitting parameters [21]. A calculation involving a contact resistance contribution in Eq.…”
Section: Contact Noise Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%