2006
DOI: 10.1021/la061190f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct Electron TransferA Favorite Electron Route for Cellobiose Dehydrogenase (CDH) from Trametes villosa. Comparison with CDH from Phanerochaete chrysosporium

Abstract: This paper presents some functional differences as well as similarities observed when comparing the newly discovered cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) from Trametes villosa (T.v.) with the well-characterized one from Phanerochaete chrysosporium (P.c.). The enzymes were physically adsorbed on spectrographic graphite electrodes placed in an amperometric flow through cell connected to a flow system. In the case of T.v.-CDH-modified graphite electrodes, a high direct electron transfer (DET) current was registered at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most attractive electrode elements for a potentially implantable BFC is a carbon material, which is cheap, abundant and biocompatible. To design this BFC, SPGE were chosen, as such electrodes are well-characterised [30] and widely used for bioelectrochemical studies of variety of enzymes including different CDH [17,28,31,32] and BOx [20,29], on which both bioelements showed excellent DET-based bioelectrocatalysis (Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the most attractive electrode elements for a potentially implantable BFC is a carbon material, which is cheap, abundant and biocompatible. To design this BFC, SPGE were chosen, as such electrodes are well-characterised [30] and widely used for bioelectrochemical studies of variety of enzymes including different CDH [17,28,31,32] and BOx [20,29], on which both bioelements showed excellent DET-based bioelectrocatalysis (Figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The redox potential of the heme group, the electrochemically active domain of CtCDH acting as the electron donor to the bioanode, is not yet known. However, based on the starting potentials of glucose bioelectrooxidation, on the steady-state potentials of CtCDH-modified SPGEs in the absence and presence of glucose (Table 3), as well as on previous studies of other CtCDHs from different fungi [11,12,14,17,28,32,33], one can assume that the redox potential of the heme group is close to 150 mV versus NHE. The differences between the steady-state potentials of the MvBOx-and CtCDH-SPGEs determine the maximal open circuit potential of the BFC operating in glucose-containing PBS and human serum, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, for cellobiose dehydrogenase, differences in the optimum pH for mediated electron transfer of the catalytic domain and the direct electron transfer of the holoenzyme were observed. [35] A further consideration addresses the driving force, which increases with increasing pH, because the formal potential of the heme and Os center are less pH dependent than that of the molybdenum cofactor. [36] This makes the reaction between Moco and Os more likely at high pH.…”
Section: Potential and Ph Dependence Of The Electrocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diese Form der Signalkette kann durch das Einbetten zweier unterschiedlicher Biokatalysatoren, dem MultikupferEnzym Laccase (Lac) [37] und dem Multidomänen-Enzym Cellobiosedehydrogenase (CDH), [38] und dem Redoxprotein Cytochrom c (Cyt c) in eine künstliche Matrix bestehend aus carboxymodifzierten Siliciumdioxidnanopartikeln aufgebaut werden (Abbildung 1).…”
unclassified