2017
DOI: 10.4103/ijps.ijps_177_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct electrical injury to brachial plexus

Abstract: Electrical current can cause neurological damage directly or by conversion to thermal energy. However, electrical injury causing isolated brachial plexus injury without cutaneous burns is extremely rare. We present a case of a 17-year-old boy who sustained accidental electrical injury to left upper extremity with no associated entry or exit wounds. Complete motor and sensory loss in upper limb were noted immediately after injury. Subsequently, the patient showed partial recovery in muscles around the shoulder … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is necessary to conduct nerve sensory tests in patients with electrical injury in time to verify whether there is potential damage to the nervous system. Furthermore, T1 and T2 weighted images of MRI can assess the specificity of brain tissue as well as neural parenchymal changes in the brain (Chandrasekhar et al, 2018 ), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an effective technical tool to evaluate nerve tract damage (Devale et al, 2017 ). Unfortunately, the patient in our case report did not undergo DTI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to conduct nerve sensory tests in patients with electrical injury in time to verify whether there is potential damage to the nervous system. Furthermore, T1 and T2 weighted images of MRI can assess the specificity of brain tissue as well as neural parenchymal changes in the brain (Chandrasekhar et al, 2018 ), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an effective technical tool to evaluate nerve tract damage (Devale et al, 2017 ). Unfortunately, the patient in our case report did not undergo DTI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%