1999
DOI: 10.1006/mcpr.1999.0250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct detection of vanA and vanB genes in clinical specimens for rapid identification of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) using multiplex PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Satake et al (39) first described the detection of vanA and vanB directly from fecal specimens using a multiplex PCR in a gel-based assay. Gel-based assays that detect vanA and vanB directly from fecal specimens or rectal swabs have reported sensitivities of 68 to 87% and specificities approaching 100% (34,39). However, gel-based assays, while they are capable of providing results within 6 to 8 h from the time of specimen collection, increase the risk of laboratory and sample contamination, require more technician time, and slow the time to detection, in comparison to real-time PCR-based assays.…”
Section: Detection Of Vre Directly From Patient Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satake et al (39) first described the detection of vanA and vanB directly from fecal specimens using a multiplex PCR in a gel-based assay. Gel-based assays that detect vanA and vanB directly from fecal specimens or rectal swabs have reported sensitivities of 68 to 87% and specificities approaching 100% (34,39). However, gel-based assays, while they are capable of providing results within 6 to 8 h from the time of specimen collection, increase the risk of laboratory and sample contamination, require more technician time, and slow the time to detection, in comparison to real-time PCR-based assays.…”
Section: Detection Of Vre Directly From Patient Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the simultaneous detection of the vancomycin resistance genes vanA and vanB by PCR, the annealing temperatures of the necessary primer pairs were chosen within the same temperature range to perform a so-called multiplex-PCR. In combination with microtitre plate hybridisation the multiplex PCR analysis of clinical isolates only took 8 hours instead of the required 24-48 hours when a culturing procedure is used [49]. By combining the results of three multiplex PCRs specific for genes coding for aminoglycoside acetyltransferases, nucleotidyltransferases and phosphotransferases, seven classes of aminoglycoside-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains responsible for nosocomial infections could be identified [44].…”
Section: Pcr-based Detection Of Antibiotic Resistance Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture-based screening methods for VRE are typically time-consuming and can take from 1 to 5 days to complete (9,11,15,16). The phenotypic methods used at present for the detection of glycopeptide resistance are also limited in their abilities to detect low-level glycopeptide resistance and to distinguish between the different Van types (3,6,17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many microbiology laboratories have recently introduced PCR for confirmation of the presence of isolates of VRE to facilitate the rapid and accurate identification of these organisms. The application of PCR for the detection of VRE directly from clinical surveillance specimens or enrichment broths can further reduce the detection time (11,15,16,18). Those studies that have used conventional PCR have reported various degrees of sensitivity and high degrees of specificity, thus providing encouraging results for the direct detection of VRE in these specimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%