2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct dating of Eocene reverse faulting in northeastern Tibet using Ar-dating of fault clays and low-temperature thermochronometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
167
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
167
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 M ? 1M d ) versus apparent K-Ar age, Ar-Ar age, or e kt -1 (where k is the decay constant and t is time) can provide both the protolith (100 %) and authigenic (0 %) ages (Pevear 1999;Van der Pluijm et al 2001Ylagan et al 2002;Haines and van der Pluijm 2010;Solum et al 2010;Duvall et al 2011;Hnat and van der Pluijm 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 M ? 1M d ) versus apparent K-Ar age, Ar-Ar age, or e kt -1 (where k is the decay constant and t is time) can provide both the protolith (100 %) and authigenic (0 %) ages (Pevear 1999;Van der Pluijm et al 2001Ylagan et al 2002;Haines and van der Pluijm 2010;Solum et al 2010;Duvall et al 2011;Hnat and van der Pluijm 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The event initially appears at the southern margin of NE Tibet as displacement along the WNW-trending West Qinling fault zone at 45-50 Ma (Clark et al, 2010;Duvall et al, 2011). During this time, the West Qinling fault zone experienced rapid cooling and exhumation (Clark et al, 2010;Duvall et al, 2011).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The closure temperature of coarse-grained (100 µm) musco vite at cooling rates of 10°C/Ma is around 405°C at a pressure of 5 kbar (or 425°C at 10 kbar; Harrison et al, 2009). Based on the same diffusion parameters, Duvall et al (2011) estimated the closure temperature of fine-grained muscovite (2-0.05 µm) to be 250-350°C. This is consistent with empirical studies based on present-day borehole temperatures and estimated palaeotemperatures, which consistently indicate closure temperatures >250°C for illite <2 µm (Hunziker et al, 1986;Wemmer & Ahrendt, 1997).…”
Section: Illite and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though it contains no illite, its K-concentration is similar to that of the finer fractions, suggesting that most of the potassium might come from the K-feldspar, and the age is essentially a K-feldspar age. Fine-grained K-feldspar has a potentially lower closure temperature (350-150°C; Lovera et al, 1989) than illite/muscovite (425-250°C; Harrison et al, 2009;Duvall et al, 2011) and could therefore be reset at lower temperatures, yielding younger ages. However, this requires fault activity at temperatures exceeding the closure temperature of K-feldspar; the temperatures indicated by the high KI values of the sample (100-200°C) are barely high enough and hostrock temperatures in the Late Jurassic were well below the closure temperature of K-feldspar (Rohrman et al, 1995;Ksienzyk et al, 2014).…”
Section: Palaeozoic Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%