2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0989-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct comparison of FP-CIT SPECT and F-DOPA PET in patients with Parkinson’s disease and healthy controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
52
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in mean age could theoretically enhance the difference in 18 F-FDOPA uptake between patients and controls. However, 18 F-FDOPA uptake shows no or only a minimal decrease during aging (15,(28)(29)(30); therefore, it is unlikely that the small difference in the ages of the PD patients and the healthy controls in the present study would have affected the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This difference in mean age could theoretically enhance the difference in 18 F-FDOPA uptake between patients and controls. However, 18 F-FDOPA uptake shows no or only a minimal decrease during aging (15,(28)(29)(30); therefore, it is unlikely that the small difference in the ages of the PD patients and the healthy controls in the present study would have affected the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Eshuis et al [13] reported a significant age-dependent decline in the SOR of FP-CIT of 3.9% per decade in healthy controls. A study using beta-CIT SPECT showed a reduction in striatal binding of 6.6% per decade [14]; another SPECT study using Tc-99m TRODAT demonstrated a decline of 6.2% per decade [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Briefly, an initial template was generated by summing the SPAM images [15] of striatum, brain, and head, with multiplying different weighting factors (9.0, 0.5, and 0.5, respectively). Afterward, the initial template was smoothed with a 12-mm Gaussian kernel to adjust resolution.…”
Section: Spam-based Automatic Voi and Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A VOI can be drawn manually with aid of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or semiautomatically using standard VOI [10][11][12]. Another method for VOI delineation is normalization of image to a standard brain template [13][14][15]. However, these methods are still laborious for routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%