2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct comparison of atomic layer deposition and sputtering of In2O3:H used as transparent conductive oxide layer in CuIn1−xGaxSe2 thin film solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the IQE is increasing with increasing carrier generation depth/wavelength (ie, greater distance from the buffer/absorber interface), a remaining interface recombination even for this and all other samples with a “spike” configuration is suggested. This seems to be a general observation: a maximum IQE that approaches 1, as usually measured for well‐behaving low‐gap chalcopyrite solar cells (maximum IQE > 0.98, see, eg, Keller et al), was, to the authors' knowledge, not reported for a cell with E g > 1.45 eV, yet. When increasing Ag/I to 0.8 and GGI to 0.85, slightly larger collection losses become visible again.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Since the IQE is increasing with increasing carrier generation depth/wavelength (ie, greater distance from the buffer/absorber interface), a remaining interface recombination even for this and all other samples with a “spike” configuration is suggested. This seems to be a general observation: a maximum IQE that approaches 1, as usually measured for well‐behaving low‐gap chalcopyrite solar cells (maximum IQE > 0.98, see, eg, Keller et al), was, to the authors' knowledge, not reported for a cell with E g > 1.45 eV, yet. When increasing Ag/I to 0.8 and GGI to 0.85, slightly larger collection losses become visible again.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Three TCOs are investigated here: (1) sputtered i‐ZnO/ZnO:Al (reference), (2) chemical vapor deposited (CVD) ZnO:B, and (3) sputtered In 2 O 3 :H. In this way, a change in deposition method as well as a change in material system can be compared. It was shown before, that by exchanging ZnO:Al with a ZnO:B TCO, the short circuit current density J SC can be increased, while for In 2 O 3 :H an improved J SC and V oc was observed . However, these studies were conducted on CIGSe solar cells, which were not subjected to a KF‐PDT step during processing.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It was shown before, that by exchanging ZnO:Al with a ZnO:B TCO, the short circuit current density J SC can be increased, 9 while for In 2 O 3 :H an improved J SC and V oc was observed. 10 However, these studies were conducted on CIGSe solar cells, which were not subjected to a KF-PDT step during processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when incorporated in the front contact layers, In 2 O 3 ‐based materials can potentially generate higher conversion efficiency than ZnO‐based materials, and we demonstrate this concept with a ‐In‐Ga‐Zn‐O ( a ‐IGZO)/ a ‐In 2 O 3 :H front contact layers . Furthermore, several experimental studies revealed that In 2 O 3 ‐based TCOs reduced the electrical loss caused by series resistance and optical loss because of free carrier absorption within the TCO layer while improving the stability of solar cells and mini‐modules. Recently, Keller et al applied various TCO (ZnO:Al, ZnO:B, and In 2 O 3 :H) layers in CIGS solar cells with KF‐PDT .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%