2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direct and indirect laboratory measurements of poroelastic properties of two consolidated sandstones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evolution of the normalized porosity with respect to the mean effective stress. The nonlinear behaviour at low effective stress as observed in the experimental data (red line after Blöcher et al, 2014) is well captured by the modelling results which take into account a nonlinear evolution of the elastic moduli resulting from closure of pre-existing micro-cracks and fissures enhanced by compaction of the porous space followed by stiffening of the rock (increase Hertzian contact surface between solid grains).…”
Section: Mathematical Formulation Of the Problemsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Evolution of the normalized porosity with respect to the mean effective stress. The nonlinear behaviour at low effective stress as observed in the experimental data (red line after Blöcher et al, 2014) is well captured by the modelling results which take into account a nonlinear evolution of the elastic moduli resulting from closure of pre-existing micro-cracks and fissures enhanced by compaction of the porous space followed by stiffening of the rock (increase Hertzian contact surface between solid grains).…”
Section: Mathematical Formulation Of the Problemsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In case of the B ind inferred from poroelastic theory, the values are lower, ranging between 0.8 and 0.6. In our case, both the direct and indirect measurements fit with the B ind of Blöcher et al []. However, the variations from 0.8 to 0.6 the authors measured were on a water‐saturated sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not much conclusion can be given at this point, it remains of interest to discuss further on the possible bias. Because the authors found a method to measure pore pressure in the rock sample and not in the dead volume, the method of measurement of Blöcher et al [] should be more trusted. It could thus be that the effect of the dead volumes is here underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative approach for determining the poroelastic coupling parameter is to measure the Biot and Skempton coefficients directly, without measuring static elastic moduli. That is, the fluid mass content can be monitored to obtain Biot's coefficient, and the Skempton coefficient can be measured as the ratio of the induced pore pressure to the change in applied confining pressure for undrained conditions (Hassanzadegan et al, 2012;Blöcher et al, 2014). This has the advantages that no stress-strain measurements are required and the effective velocity ratio can be related directly to the poroelastic coupling parameter.…”
Section: Poroelastic and Dynamic Moduli Of Malm Carbonatementioning
confidence: 99%